<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: China &#8211; the big change.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/03/china-the-big-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/03/china-the-big-change/</link>
	<description>Author of THE DEBT GENERATION</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 15:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Golem XIV - Thoughts		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/03/china-the-big-change/#comment-109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Golem XIV - Thoughts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/03/china-the-big-change/#comment-109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[oldgustaf,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Could be. I don&#039;t seriously expect CHina to go from over all export surplus to deficit in one quarter and stay there.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it doesn&#039;t have to be an absolute deficit for this to make a big difference.  It&#039;s all about IF China stops relying so much on exports and starts to re-shape its economy to focus more domestically.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We rely on them buying debt.  That only has to slow to be important.  Narrower trade surpluses, never mind actual deficits, at a time of ballooning debt sales would be trouble.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only other thing to keep in mind is that Current Account surplus isn&#039;t the same thing as trade with us.  It is a measure of all trade with all foreign partners.  I think trade with Asia and oil nations will indeed go up.  I don&#039;t think we should assume trade with the US, Europe and GB will all be on the up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I might well be completely wrong. Please don&#039;t forget I&#039;m not an insider nor an expert.  All I&#039;m doing is thinking out loud.  I&#039;ll be as interested as you to see what really does happen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oldgustaf,</p>
<p>Could be. I don&#39;t seriously expect CHina to go from over all export surplus to deficit in one quarter and stay there.  </p>
<p>But it doesn&#39;t have to be an absolute deficit for this to make a big difference.  It&#39;s all about IF China stops relying so much on exports and starts to re-shape its economy to focus more domestically.  </p>
<p>We rely on them buying debt.  That only has to slow to be important.  Narrower trade surpluses, never mind actual deficits, at a time of ballooning debt sales would be trouble.</p>
<p>The only other thing to keep in mind is that Current Account surplus isn&#39;t the same thing as trade with us.  It is a measure of all trade with all foreign partners.  I think trade with Asia and oil nations will indeed go up.  I don&#39;t think we should assume trade with the US, Europe and GB will all be on the up.</p>
<p>I might well be completely wrong. Please don&#39;t forget I&#39;m not an insider nor an expert.  All I&#39;m doing is thinking out loud.  I&#39;ll be as interested as you to see what really does happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: oldgustaf		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/03/china-the-big-change/#comment-108</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oldgustaf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/03/china-the-big-change/#comment-108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;...many economists don’t expect any trade deficit to last long, and China is still likely to post a large trade surplus this year. The World Bank forecasts that China’s current-account surplus, the broadest measure of its trade position, will rise this year to $304 billion, after dropping to $284.1 billion in 2009 from a record $426.1 billion in 2008.&#034; Wall Street Journal, 24/03/2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&#8230;many economists don’t expect any trade deficit to last long, and China is still likely to post a large trade surplus this year. The World Bank forecasts that China’s current-account surplus, the broadest measure of its trade position, will rise this year to $304 billion, after dropping to $284.1 billion in 2009 from a record $426.1 billion in 2008.&quot; Wall Street Journal, 24/03/2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
