<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BoE buys $45 Billion of US debt at a time the UK is broke.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/</link>
	<description>Author of THE DEBT GENERATION</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 15:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Golem XIV - Thoughts		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Golem XIV - Thoughts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 20:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tam,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One thing I am confident of is that there is no transparency at all. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No reasons need to be given.  Various fronts can be and are used to buy, while disguising the end buyer.  The Chinese have, by all accounts been using off-shores in the Caymans for some time.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But conspiracies aside the simple fact remains that there has been no credible buyer identified for all the hundreds of billions of debt that are being bought. The FED has been buying a LOT.  Funds buy but not to keep.  Who are they selling on to?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The stakes are so life and death at this point that any hint of a no-bid at the FED and the world really would end for them.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I admit it is ONLY a theory.  But remember the banks have done this among themselves for years.  They call it subordinated debt.  It&#039;s how so many banks are tied together in a debt suicide pact.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I rally believe nations have gone down the same path.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tam,</p>
<p>One thing I am confident of is that there is no transparency at all. </p>
<p>No reasons need to be given.  Various fronts can be and are used to buy, while disguising the end buyer.  The Chinese have, by all accounts been using off-shores in the Caymans for some time.  </p>
<p>But conspiracies aside the simple fact remains that there has been no credible buyer identified for all the hundreds of billions of debt that are being bought. The FED has been buying a LOT.  Funds buy but not to keep.  Who are they selling on to?</p>
<p>The stakes are so life and death at this point that any hint of a no-bid at the FED and the world really would end for them.  </p>
<p>I admit it is ONLY a theory.  But remember the banks have done this among themselves for years.  They call it subordinated debt.  It&#39;s how so many banks are tied together in a debt suicide pact.</p>
<p>I rally believe nations have gone down the same path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tam		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 20:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that, there&#039;s some interesting information in those tables.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not sure about your theory though I don&#039;t know enough to suggest any alternatives. Wouldn&#039;t that only really work if the volumes of the trades between the US and the UK were kept confidential?  As it is, I&#039;d have thought the transparency would keep the US and UK relatively honest unless they think the debt traders are muppets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that, there&#39;s some interesting information in those tables.</p>
<p>Not sure about your theory though I don&#39;t know enough to suggest any alternatives. Wouldn&#39;t that only really work if the volumes of the trades between the US and the UK were kept confidential?  As it is, I&#39;d have thought the transparency would keep the US and UK relatively honest unless they think the debt traders are muppets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lars Eirik		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-284</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lars Eirik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 19:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I, for one, hold your explanation to be the most plausible. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This kind of hard fact surely must be possible to verify/falsify during question time in the British parliament. At least one MP must be interested?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the question is not hinged too firmly on &#039;operation&#039;, but focuses on the exact quantity of holdings and liabilities versus the other government for every last 6 months (do they even out?), it should not be possible to dodge the question altogether.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Norway, I have started asking questions to the Finance departement&#039;s communication department - with some progress - puzzled at recieving private citizens&#039; queries. Surely your &#039;homologue&#039; institution in GB provides similar services - for obtaining hard facts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, hold your explanation to be the most plausible. </p>
<p>This kind of hard fact surely must be possible to verify/falsify during question time in the British parliament. At least one MP must be interested?</p>
<p>If the question is not hinged too firmly on &#39;operation&#39;, but focuses on the exact quantity of holdings and liabilities versus the other government for every last 6 months (do they even out?), it should not be possible to dodge the question altogether.</p>
<p>In Norway, I have started asking questions to the Finance departement&#39;s communication department &#8211; with some progress &#8211; puzzled at recieving private citizens&#39; queries. Surely your &#39;homologue&#39; institution in GB provides similar services &#8211; for obtaining hard facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Golem XIV - Thoughts		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Golem XIV - Thoughts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Raw TIC data here. http://www.treas.gov/tic/snetus.txt&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think I&#039;m reading this properly.  But please correct me if I have got it wrong.  Soon if you can, so I can correct the mistake and apologise.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I did check over at Zerohedge here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.zerohedge.com/article/march-tic-data-released-broke-uks-treasury-holdings-go-exponential&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My reading differed from Zerohedge&#039;s but I defer to their far greater knowledge and went with their figure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raw TIC data here. <a href="http://www.treas.gov/tic/snetus.txt" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.treas.gov/tic/snetus.txt</a></p>
<p>I think I&#39;m reading this properly.  But please correct me if I have got it wrong.  Soon if you can, so I can correct the mistake and apologise.  </p>
<p>I did check over at Zerohedge here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/march-tic-data-released-broke-uks-treasury-holdings-go-exponential" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.zerohedge.com/article/march-tic-data-released-broke-uks-treasury-holdings-go-exponential</a></p>
<p>My reading differed from Zerohedge&#39;s but I defer to their far greater knowledge and went with their figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tam		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/05/boe-buys-45-billion-of-us-debt-at-a-time-the-uk-is-broke/#comment-282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey Golem&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;can you please provide a reference for that 45 billion?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Golem</p>
<p>can you please provide a reference for that 45 billion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
