<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: American Debt	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/07/american-debt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/07/american-debt/</link>
	<description>Author of THE DEBT GENERATION</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 15:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: RichGB		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/07/american-debt/#comment-651</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RichGB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/07/american-debt/#comment-651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Golem,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps I haven&#039;t fully comprehended your previous posts about leverage, but something has been puzzling me for a while. With all this incestuous lending between financial institutions is it not possible for Party A to say to Party B, &#034;Listen up. I have your debt and you have mine. Let&#039;s exchange so that we can say &#039;Bang! And the dirt is gone.&#039;. What do you say?&#034;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bringing my other brain cell on line, I can see that mutual destruction of negative numbers does not address the issue of valuing the assets, so the problem may be that Party A and Party B cannot decide how far below zero to go.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now I can&#039;t get &#039;Yes Minister&#039; out of my head.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Golem,</p>
<p>Perhaps I haven&#39;t fully comprehended your previous posts about leverage, but something has been puzzling me for a while. With all this incestuous lending between financial institutions is it not possible for Party A to say to Party B, &quot;Listen up. I have your debt and you have mine. Let&#39;s exchange so that we can say &#39;Bang! And the dirt is gone.&#39;. What do you say?&quot;</p>
<p>Bringing my other brain cell on line, I can see that mutual destruction of negative numbers does not address the issue of valuing the assets, so the problem may be that Party A and Party B cannot decide how far below zero to go.</p>
<p>Now I can&#39;t get &#39;Yes Minister&#39; out of my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Golem XIV - Thoughts		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/07/american-debt/#comment-649</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Golem XIV - Thoughts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/07/american-debt/#comment-649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cheers Dexter,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bad mistake. Used an old 2003 figure.  Sorry.  the total is less these day s but figures vary so much that I have opted for the cheesey option of &#034;tens of trillions&#034;.  I hate those meaningless generalisations but exagerationis wore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sorry mate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Dexter,</p>
<p>Bad mistake. Used an old 2003 figure.  Sorry.  the total is less these day s but figures vary so much that I have opted for the cheesey option of &quot;tens of trillions&quot;.  I hate those meaningless generalisations but exagerationis wore.</p>
<p>Sorry mate.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dexter Midnight		</title>
		<link>https://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/07/american-debt/#comment-647</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dexter Midnight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golemxiv.co.uk/2010/07/american-debt/#comment-647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Golem&lt;br /&gt;&#034;60 Trillion&#034; - is that what you really reckon there is in the form of unexploded CDS debt?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then there really is no fixing it - is there?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Golem<br />&quot;60 Trillion&quot; &#8211; is that what you really reckon there is in the form of unexploded CDS debt?</p>
<p>Then there really is no fixing it &#8211; is there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
