It does have the best comments and I would like to add my profound thanks.

Shaun of course there are ‘buts’, infinities of them and undoubtedly the biggest waste of those buts is when they are silenced by a fabricated apathy whether self induced or introduced by the spin masters.

For me the benchmark is this para: “The role of Nature accepted, we then have to ask; whether in the affairs of humanity, any concept, system, practice or ideology which doesn’t improve the wellbeing, contentment, security and advancement of the majority of the species and its survival, has any claim to legitimacy or continuance by establishment or custom?

This may at first glance read as a grand and challenging aspiration but, surprisingly the vast majority of us apply it to our everyday world in any number of ways.

Ahh but… and you knew there were going to be “buts”…

“Free will and determinism”. Both are dependent on the “person” being in some way able to decide (in which camp he/she belongs in). Good for an elite. Are they any good for us nowadays?

Where then, does the present day situation stand, of some controlling others by media, manipulation and other mind bendings; and the others who are being controlled or guided, even against their will?

We have a financial crooked elite, backed by the usual venal politicians and a warped media base. Who profess “free-will” but follow the manipulated markets for a quick buck. – Then we have the muppets and sheeple. Most of whom wear the uniform of blue jeans or bermudas (to show they are on holiday), and exercise their free will by buying. Sometimes we even have others who (really) have free will or those that believe that “all is written” (the minority).

So, my “but” is ; that we give too much credence to the lordly sayings of the official twitterazzi (made up from paparazzi, but using “twit chatterers”), and not enough attention to the fact that the attention span of humanity is about equal to the chimps from which we came. That theories about conspiracies do not take into account that the majority of humanity are non-participants in their own future. BY DESIGN (by design of the corruptocracy)

In other words, to reverse the present trends, it will take more than simply a few intelligent words – but more a sea-change in the education of humans.

(The conclusion – which seems accurate, “The Gadarenes want to impose their virtual world on us, not because they believe it will lead to a better world – they know it won’t.
– But for “they slaver over the possibilities of global domination,” I prefer the words “the possibilities of global slavery”.)

I’m sure David, like most of us. has the usual difficulties of trying to balance the fight for the possible with the everyday demands and nuances of existence. From the little I know I doubt the profession he has chosen allows little scope for a fixed type of life schedule.

In the meantime there’s plenty to comment on. From the bling of the Olympics, the Standard Chartered fiasco to the inhuman destruction of the UK welfare system by idealogical dinosaurs.

it has been said -we live in an interesting time – this is true, but the interest is of a frightening nature and the changes its bringing are not in the direction we should be heading.

We need a fundamental re-evaluation of our values and an irrevocable commitment to seeing these are met by the people we chose to represent us.

Here is my take on the subject . ( I may have posted this before -I’m a bit lax with my index)

The Gadarenes of Finance.

“we are a people possessed
like the madman of the Gadarenes
our souls howl with contempt
as greedy lips consume us
our “democracy”
silences the wise
our “prosperity”
impoverishes the meek
our “freedom”
imprisons the beloved
devoured by the Legion.”

Martin Gadaran.

: The People Business.

Intro.

This exercise is about us. All of us, the Homo sapiens that dominate this planet we call earth and the world we manufacture in order to pass our time on it.

As a species we are dominant. We have conquered land, sea and sky, beginning to probe into the universe and in most cases can choose either to decimate or manage every other species on earth from whale to virus – though the latter causes us the greater problems. Animal, vegetable or mineral we regard as resources dormant until we uncover their latent potentials, which are then ours to exploit.

We are not unique in our exploitation. Viruses exploit anything that suits them in the animal and vegetable world, whales exploit the food of the oceans, plants the nutrients of sun, soil and rains, and minerals the geophysics created by change through the ages. However it is only our specie that can reason and understand these things. And even if we don’t understand, we know that there are others in our species that do and if the need arises, we can study their understanding and learn from them.

Even in this team learning approach we are not unique, though other species may use the suckling bribe in order in order to establish its practice. Nor are we unique in our flaws, the propensity to kill or intimate anger or violence is used through most if not all of the species. Even our ability to reason is not unique; a dog learns tricks or performs duties because it associates it with – probably in some, to it, mysterious way – a duty or game pleasing to its master. That’s still reasoning.

So in the natural sense we have no specifically unique qualities. We can’t dive like a whale, run at the speed of a cheetah or fly like a bird but by the development of our brain and its ability to construct abstract thought we can beat the abilities of the natural species in all these ventures. Now abstract thought isn’t inventiveness. Man didn’t invent fire; he witnessed it through some natural occurrence. Just as he noticed a round rock was easier to roll than a square one. The abstract was in seeing how both of these could be used to advantage.

This was the time when Homo sapiens began to exploit his nature; the foundation of civilization and the gestation of the People Business.

What won’t be included in this discourse are masses of dates, statistics, graphs or formula. Whether this genesis of abstract thought happened one hundred thousand, fifty or thirty thousand years ago is totally irrelevant.

As is recorded history; which in itself is a product of abstract thought – perhaps a fairly advanced thought, since the need was seen to hold an account of the past in order to explain the present and to try and shape the future – but in essence its only a sophistication of folk lore, tribal squabbles, a record of animal movement and numbers and the time to reap and sow. And as a record of account in The People Business it has proved to be flawed through the abilities to apply the same abstract capabilities to its construction, interpretation and exploitation.

So, dismissing all the yesterdays as irrelevant, how do we handle our day and hopefully our tomorrows, in what, by the sheer chance of birth, is the business we are thrust in to.

I suppose the first thing we must recognise is that ‘The People Business’ has a hierarchy. A hierarchy created sometimes by the same chances awarded by birth, at others by the environment we find ourselves in and the values that environment regards as our potential usefulness as a resource in the business.

Taking the above as a given surely we have to ask a question as to the purpose and objectives of this business that only death or imbecility (at times not even that) excuses us from participating in.

But before we do we have to consider how we are capable of asking it. Nature created this earth and every form of life that’s ever been on it and, while we may be capable of exploiting the elements of nature we are a long way off, if ever, of being able to claim dominion over them. Nature is by its nature a dictator. Perhaps generally benign, avuncular, acquiescent it never the less has no care whether we as a species choose to continue to thrive on its planet or be wiped out by nature itself or by self destruction. This is the irrevocable ‘given’ without which the gestation of ‘T he People Business’ would never have been formed and must be the primary factor on which the scales of values and solvency of the business is measured.

The role of Nature accepted, we then have to ask; whether in the affairs of humanity, any concept, system, practice or ideology which doesn’t improve the wellbeing, contentment, security and advancement of the majority of the species and its survival, has any claim to legitimacy or continuance by establishment or custom?

If the answer is no – we have gazillions of problems to sort out.

If the answer is yes – then life for most will continue to be a vale of tears waiting for a death date.

While I believe the answer to the question as posed would result in an overwhelming majority of No’s over the Yes’s, it leads us to ponder on what we actually mean by concepts such as wellbeing, contentment, security, advancement and how we tie these in with the species survival.

This is a problem that has exercised the minds of philosophers and thinkers throughout the ages. At the basic level they have divided it into two camps, called one Determinism, and the other Free Will. Again at the basic level Determinists maintain every happening in life or nature is preordained and humanity has no more control over its outcome than a rock can change into a horse; therefore humanity has no capacity for exercising or claiming the ability of true Free Will. We could call this the God camp.

Advocates of Free Will argue; we have to have free will because we have the ability to make choices. That while we may feel anger enough to kill in some circumstance, we choose not to and choose instead to adopt reason and apply restraint.

Throughout the ages these arguments have developed and formed sects then sub sects; some with a tentative toe in the other camp while others firmly straddle both while rejecting some of each, and so on. Candidly much of the argument is esoteric, often to the level of vanity, and could be summed up as an argument over whether a static ball bearing is downside up or upside down.

Yet the paradox of this hypothesis is not only how little consideration we give to it in our daily lives, it is the scale in which we use it to form our values, morality and our place in society. To clarify, I’ll give you an example – Scientists generally consider themselves free thinkers. While that may well be a true and honest belief, much of their work as scientist is to un-cover and understand inherent qualities and potentials in whatever subject or substance they’re working on. Whether their work proves true or false or they trip over the discovery of the millennium is entirely determined by the inherent qualities that have always existed in that subject or substance. So as individuals they practice free will, or think they do; but in work they’re controlled and measured by determinism.

Confused? Well aren’t we all, and that includes those who are devoting their lives to defining the solution. But take some heart, generally these people are looking for truth with no malicious intent or goal of global dominance; perhaps a little glory and personal comfort from a prize or two and again generally, they’re a pretty egalitarian lot who want to serve humanity.

So in order to define the purpose(s) of The People Business we have to accept another irrevocable truth.

a) God – is not an excuse.
b) gods – are not an excuse.

And beliefs are doubts that can only be truly dispelled by truths.

So the question facing us today is whether the beliefs being thrust on us by the Gadarenes of finance and their armies of acolytes does improve or offer any legitimate purpose to the life of our species or is it merely an element of control engineered as bulwarks of beliefs against blindingly obvious, and eventually, irrevocable truths?

Some time ago, in a forgotten article based on the financial meltdown and Browns stupid response to it, I posited the question – “Were governments acting as Human Resource Managers for the Global Conglomerates?”

At the time I was advocating the Banks should be resourced in order to meet their retail and genuine business functions – but all other activities should be placed in moratorium until such time as these have been forensically analysed and a true value awarded.

A few commentators agreed, but most got carried away on the lexicon of acronyms and the vanity of their ability, or belief, that they understood the complexities and labyrinthine formulas used in the alchemy’s of this most infinitely plastic of all commodities. In fact ‘plastic’ is too constricting – this commodity is the virtuoso of versatility. It can be used to buy or sell without ever having to be accounted for, it can lever its value up or down without ever having to produce a product or supply a service. Of late even the little it had to produce in order to prove its existence has been reduced to pieces of plastic for the minions or the production of digital zero digits for its acolytes – all together not a bad ‘miracle’ for these modern day Gadarenes to bring about.

Unfortunately there are another couple of adjectives beginning with V that we have to apply: the miracle like the substance it’s based on is without virtue – both are in essence ‘virtual’ and who has ever been troubled by a ‘virtual’ conscience?

The Gadarenes want to impose their virtual world on us, not because they believe it will lead to a better world – they know it won’t. But they slaver over the possibilities of global domination.

How’s that for an ambition based on an armoury of smoke, mirrors and propaganda? And could it be done without the contrivance of our politicians and governments?

(Extract from: The People Business.)

John Souter
30/09/11

it’s not dying, it’s just resting :). TPTB are keeping Golem busy to try to stop him exposing their sham systems.

Perhaps Hawkeye could do one of his very excellent guest posts whilst Golem is indisposed.
(not to put any pressure on you here Hawkeye but it was your top posts on the Beeb that brought me here in the first place :)).

If someone suggests a subject/title then I am prepared to give a stab at writing an article (it probably wouldn’t be any good but it might provoke mild interest/outrage until the main player resumes his place centre stage).

John, – thanks for reply.

Amazing what you find when you are not really looking. I was trying to find a visual, seen somewhile ago on zero hedge, using the terms “visual trillion” – (a graphic showing the number of lorries with containers that would be used to carry 1 trillion of dollars, to be divided with number of containers carried by one ship, etc. ok, I was trying NOT to do the work I should…)

However, this came up.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/verge-historic-inversion-shadow-banking

Which makes interesting reading, as it shows that there has been a rapid decline in the shadow banking world (which is deposit-less), and inflation MUST reclaim attention in the US. (as in EU?)
Two quotes below;

1/ “What shadow banking has been for America is nothing short of an inflation buffer. Recall what the primary characteristic of shadow banking is: it performs all the traditional credit intermediation transformations that conventional banking entities do: Maturity, Credit and Liquidity.

However, unlike traditional banks, shadow banking has one huge deficiency: it has no deposits! In other words, the entire rickety shadow banking system is based simply on the good faith and credit that rehypothecated assets, converted into liabilities, and so on (think repos and reverse repos) courtesy of fractional reserve credit formation (recall rehypothecation), are valid and credible sources of liquidity. While that may be the case in a leveraging environment, i.e., in the expansionary phase of the ponzi, it no longer works when systematically deleveraging, i.e., where we are now.”

2/ “Said inflation buffer, however, is getting smaller and smaller every quarter, and at this rate, shadow banking as a transformational conduit will completely disappear in a few short years, at which point everything will be in the hands of fickle depositors.

It is then, that America will finally figure out why Germany and the Bundesbank, are so leery of runaway printing. Because while the US still has the benefit of shadow liabilities, Europe does not. And Schauble, Merkel, and Weidmann, not to mention the German population (at least subconsciously) all know this.”

There are various sums mentioned, but as you so rightly said – there is no money in the real sense, only “traditional” banking deposits have substance – and the lumps under the mattresses.

The article does explain why “stimulii and bailouts” have no effect in the real world, and as shadow banking is based “simply on (the) good faith”….

Stevie – myth to mark and myth to market – perhaps it is designed to create employment without product? A fantastical way to ‘earn’ a mythical corn – I can see no other rational explanation for its existence.

Since 1985 I’ve tried in vain to make sense of the money game and failed miserably. Only since the meltdown of 2007 have I realised the logic I was searching for didn’t exist, only an assimilation of authority and purpose by gamblers to prop up their confidence tricks.

As the man says – this is no way to run a planet.