On the contrary, reading about Argentina seizing corporate assets made me laugh out loud in a way that I haven’t for a while. Cheers.

http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/137713/in-debt-fight-argentina-vs-influential-foes

http://en.mercopress.com/2012/12/18/argentina-says-belgian-highest-court-rules-against-seizure-of-diplomatic-accounts

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/279958969634676736

Thanks Nelson. We might win yet.

My fear and implicit acknowledgement is that Argentina and Ecuador will lose. The American strangle hold is too tight. The exorbitant privilege of the U.S. dollar coupled to the implacable U.S. military, its allies and clients is too powerful. The fact that the American government has been hijacked by the banksters leaves me feeling less than optimistic.

The best way to prepare is to remove any visual impediments, and to let others know.

Thank you so much.

Islam and unconstrained capitalism, especially the usurious banking system, are not compatible.

That may be part of the problem and partly why Muslims are being demonised and attacked, and Islam being libeled so ubiquitously.

Btw, Sharia means law.

You’re talking to the king of mis-spellings, random punctuation (my wife says I punctuate as if I were sowing seeds), and finger-trouble-typos, so please – no need to apologise over a rogue ‘y’.

Thank you for your very kind comment. They are hugely appreciated.

As for knowing who reads – there are innexpesive analytics which allow me to note teh IP address of those who log on. Ordinary people I have just a number, no name. Businesses and organizations oftern attach their name to the IP so both show up. Banks, law firms, big business, small business etc.

Many intelligence organizations attach their name – for example the US Depratment of Defence come up as DOD and then the location. So do the intelligence branches for most of the US armed services.

Most government departments announce themselves similarly.

There is, of course, a whole other set of intelligence organizations who do not announce themselves. If they chose to read I would never know.

Of those intel organizations who appear it is almost certain they are automated enquiries. COmputers running through an assigned list. The computers scan for phrases and if they find one they flag it up for further ananlysis.

There are several levels of automated analysis before you would ever get to a person who’s time is valuable.

I am certailny on teh long automated list. I can tell this from how quickly things get picked up and by whom.

I have probably also made it on to one or other shorter list which may, at times be consulted by a real person. I think this because sometimes I get 3-6 diffrerent parts of one organization reading.from very different locations. I think suggests people. I could be wrong.

As an intelligence friend of mine says – it is so very simple and cheap for teh intelligence services to scan electronic media, it requires so littlle effort and so few resources, that you should assume they are because they can at no cost to themselves.

These days intelligence is akin to market research more than 007. It is not so much spying it is about knowing what opinions are bing formed and by whom.