Currency wars enter new phase

That we are in a currency war is now obvious.  That our leaders cannot stop it becoming deeper and more acrimonious, is, after the total failure of the IMF meeting to find any policy agreement at all, now also obvious. They cannot solve it for the simple reason that is it their policies that are causing it.

At the IMF meeting not only was there no new policy to avert spreading competitive currency devaluations but what became apparent was that there is a tightening logic which will force more countries to join in. We are about to enter a new phase of the war.

The looming domestic crisis inside every nation is exactly what is locking them in to the very actions which are fuelling the currency war.  Every nation is beyond being desperate for export growth.  The stark reality is that whichever nations do not achieve some export led growth will implode under a debt load they cannot hope to pay back. EVERY nation has predicated its ‘recovery’ on levels of growth they cannot and will not achieve through domestic sales and consumption.

The problem is that the actions taken to stimulate growth and protect the interests of each nation’s ruling financial class, are precisely those which caused and are fuelling the currency war.  None of the ruling elite have a single new idea. And are thus determined upon a course of repeating what has already failed – but doing it bigger. In the U.S. more debt will be created and however much of it they cannot sell, they will buy themselves.

Their hope and intent is for the new money to stave off the cash flow strangulation their banks still face from non-performing loans, further bloat the buying power of the banks so as to allow them in turn to drag an empty Dow Jones ever higher and to try to devalue the dollar by flirting with inflation.

In Europe we too will print up more debt and we too will end up buying a lot of its ourselves.  And the hope will be that this helps to devalue the euro.  We, of course, will be immensely aided by keeping sovereign default concerns helpfully simmering away. As long as they don’t actually boil over, they are Europe’s most potent currency weapon. And the envy of the US.  Europe is now on course to let Ireland and maybe one other, restructure. That too will help devalue the Euro.

That will hurt the US, strengthen the Swiss frank and further impoverish all those Eastern nations whose borrowings are in swiss franks.

China will continue to export cheap goods made possible by their low valued currency which they will NOT re-value, and will use the profits to buy up metals and food. That buying will send prices of both up and up causing the inflation in all the things we need, even while all the worthless paper the banks are hoarding continues to deflate.  Watching all this happen the US and Europe will continue to complain bitterly about the value of the Yuan and China will continue to ignore them.

Japan will continue to hyperventilate as the utter hopelessness of their situation becomes clearer and clearer.  They too will try and fail to devalue.  The day they try to sell debt on the open market they will begin their final collapse.

Of course the obvious question all this printing and attempting to devalue raises, is why hasn’t it worked?  The simple and true answer is that when everyone tries to devalue at the same time, then all their efforts cancel each other out.  In a race to the bottom there can still only be one winner. And this is indeed what is happening. BUT there is another dangerous dimension that has so far been ignored.

All the money printed has to go somewhere?  If it stays in the domestic economy, you have too much money chasing too few goods and therefore you get inflation and eventually hyper-inflation (which to be clear are quite different animals).  But in this case the printing has not stayed in the country to chase too few goods. It has gone abroad to chase goods and high-return and/or to fuel currency speculation.  And that is a major part of why there has, so far, been no massive inflation or hyper-inflation. (Not the whole answer. The other major reason is that so much of the money has been sucked into the shadow system where it has replaced the lost value of the banker’s rotten and worthless paper and provided the cash flow to keep them alive)

The newly printed up money has gone out into the world looking for higher returns than are available in the economies which printed it.  Western cash has flooded into the ‘hot’ emerging economies of Brazil and India and would go to China if China would let it.

It might sound great to have a flood of new investment. And to a point it can be.  Indian, Brazilian and even Australian companies have found a lot of cheap money about.  BUT there is SO much money around it is forcing itself into and overstuffing, every buying opportunity and causing speculative bubbles everywhere including in bonds and currencies.

Thus Brazil and India are finding that their economies are in danger of being destabilized.  Like putting higher and higher voltage through a transformer, first it copes, then it gets hot and then it just melts.   So India has just said it is considering capital controls to stop the flow of new money. If they don’t they will find speculative bubbles forming in all sorts of commodities which will hurt both their own people and us.

But here is the further interesting part.  IF they do take action and IF they do stop or restrict the in-flow of the newly printed money we are flooding them with, THEN, where does all the money go?

Part of the reason all our printing has not caused any serious problems, so far, at home, is because it has gone abroad causing trouble over there rather than here. We have exported inflation. What happens if it starts to come home, or in the sace of QEII finds nowhere lucrative or accomodating to go in the first place?

If capital controls are brought in, in the expanding economies, our new money will have nowhere to go and no hope of a return.  It will mean there will be virtually no good effect from QEII in terms of stimulating growth which will push our banks closer to the insolvency which awaits them.  It will also, conversely, greatly increase the potency of devaluing those currencies which have printed it. Which will cause larger swings in their values. Which will make the currency war more volatile and dangerous.

Domestically we might find ourselves suddenly much closer to inflation or even hyper-inflation. Simply because so much more of the new money will stay at home. But we could also find the devaluation effects might be more sudden and potent than we thought, and our borrowing costs may jump accordingly.  If the US finds its rates edge up, that could have devastsing effects which I do not think the Fed is ready for.

The currency war is about to enter a new and much more dangerous phase.

19 thoughts on “Currency wars enter new phase”

  1. dave from france

    Well, first you had the R for Recession word, that the MSM avoided like the plague, then the D word, the P for Protectionism, and then the CC phrase for Capital ( movement )Controls .

    At last there is today a frontpage article at the FT on it, but the last was some time ago and rather hidden away …

    Don't have the time to read it so maybe someone else could check it out ?

  2. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Frog2

    I read the article. I have to say I didn't find it very adventurous. Maybe I'm being ovr dramatic but their article seemed reluctanat to tease out what it meant. Maybe I'm being unfair.

    Rob,

    Liike everything in this whole mess it's like pulling teeth to get things noticed. I notice the spike but then you see that there were only 3 comments!

    Still it is getting out now. The trend would suggest some people are getting concerned.

  3. I hope they can sort it out before things get really nasty.

    All this 'silo' mentality is childish.

    I think US are getting ready buying new printing presses from China to print more money on to pay them with printed money. Like an economic Escher waterfall.

  4. Yo G

    I got an sms which could predict your fav film. It said pick a number divide by this times by that add the numbers together etc.
    Turns out my fav film is gay biker bondage.

    I thought it was Leon.

    Isn't there a mathamatical trick that the world could do, all at the same time to reset the figures?

    Or is it like Kerplunk? Or Jenga? Or twister?

    The game only has one ending?

    Stuff is finite and it's growth growth growth baby, so surely it's doomed to failure anyway?

    I had an idea of a film for you.

    Tiles of animated graphs (mmmm graphs!) that flow with time showing the rise and fall of the relevant monies since free trade started or some other reference point. I've made timelapse films of plants and you can see them reacting to situations etc, living and breathing.

    http://www.myspace.com/strangetowncollective

  5. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Hello 24K,

    There was a mathematic trick that told them there would be a crash and the same one is telling us we can't keep growing at 3% per year for ever. But nobody pays it any attnetion. Not even when its proved correct.

    Graphs, maths, I love films about mathematics.

    Leon's a good film. Would you allow that Apocalypse Now is better?

  6. Apocalypse Now is way better.

    The tiger. The dude chucking granades, the smell of napalm in the morning. Way way better.

    But Leon has lovely little touches that mix the vision with the music.

    The way the instruments start as each narc enters the hallway at the start, the way Matilda's face lights up and the orchestra kick in when Leon opens the door for her and he holds his gun up to the door while looking through the peephole.
    When she asks "Is life always this hard?"
    And Leon says "Always".

    Or when Gary Oldman says "I haven't got time for this mickey mouse bullshit" (i made a song about that!)

    Classic. But yeah Apocalypse Now is another league. Leon is more pop movie like Taxi.

    But the ending of Leon is better.

    DON'T GO DOWN THE STAIRS! He had the balls to walk past all the police and at the last hurdle ducks out, not his style, he would've walked out bold as brass if you ask me.

    You could say just the tiger makes Apocalypse Now a better made piece of celluloid.

    I use an old XGA data projector with a Bell and Howell 2x anamorphic lens and vlc to watch cinemascope films. The lens is jerry rigged on the front but fell off and i haven't got round to making a proper shelf for it and i was meant to watch A N a while back with the bassist. I can get a bastardised HD through the 768 lines which looks pretty good.

    Time to make the shelf me thinks

    Charlie don't surf

  7. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    If you get it rigged you should watch 2001 on it. It is still an amazing film. As close to Tarkovsky as Western Cinema ever got.

  8. Dude!

    You got me googling (i want to write a song about that containing the words people need to type into google to open their eyes) Tarkovsky as i must say i was ignorant.

    Zerkalo is the dogs bollox, I'm stunned, the kids and the house on fire, and stalker. The second it starts you know it's mint.

    Maybe i don't know what my fav film is as i haven't seen it yet.

    They look like they were filmed tommorrow. i'm proper impressed. The focus is intense, not bland, precise. And there's a german shepherd in one clip.

    I got some films to watch dude, thanks

    2001, class. Is Solaris the same film Clooney remade?

  9. I know it's sacrilege, but the remake of Solaris is one of the few remakes that improved on the original, after they chopped out all that tedious bloody pondering outside the summerhouse.

    Since you didn't ask, my favourite film of all time is the Swedish film 'Together'. It's a brilliant feelgood film, without being remotely emotionally manipulative. Like a cross between 'Happiness' and 'About a Boy', it's very funny and has some important things to say about where today's society came from.

  10. Also, if you love maths, have you read Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon? (I'm kind of taking it for granted you've read Carl Sagan's 'Contact', given your family…)

  11. Sorry about turning your blog into imbd for the night but the funniest film about society is Monty Python's Life of Brian.

    Still fresh and it's over 2,000 years old.

    Bankers grrrr 🙂

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B003A4OYAU/ref=asc_df_B003A4OYAU1038877/?tag=shopping-hg-21&creative=22110&creativeASIN=B003A4OYAU&linkCode=asn

    Look at that bad boy! Dual use, manure and bankers! I'm getting you that one for christmas

    http://compare.ebay.co.uk/like/300468781015?ltyp=AllFixedPriceItemTypes&rvr_id=152185758971&crlp=1_262531_281231&UA=WXF%3F&GUID=3fdf468112b0a47a27033283ff7c4c24&mt_id=635&query=%7Bquery%7D&fitem=300468781015&linkin_id=8001609&kw=%7Bquery%7D&ff4=262531_281231

  12. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    24K,

    Glad you approve of Tarkovski. I love Stalker. I shamelessly aped its brilliant opening when I made Soul Searching.

    Tam,

    I haven't seen the Cluney version of Solaris. Should I? Neither have I seen Together. I shall try to find it. I loved "My life as a dog". Sentimental perhaps, but then so am I.

    Cryptonomicron is one of his I have not read. I loved Snow Crash. In fact its opening 30 pages are among my favourite pieces of modern writing. It contains so much insight about America and the present, never mind the future. The Deliverator!

    Life of Brian – a gem.

  13. Cryptonomicon is the best story about maths and geeks (as opposed to nerds, if you need clarification on the difference, look here) there is and it's written by someone who understands the subject, unlike certain pretentious literary types I'll refrain from naming here. If you consider yourself a geek, you'll love it. Don't be put off by its size although its even more massive prequels are more of an acquired taste.

    Not sure if you'd like the remake of Solaris. If you love Tarkovski, you'd probably keep making comparisons when you watched it, but I though it was wonderful and very powerful in its own right. It's one of the few stories in which the characters' responses to an incredible situation is utterly believable; the imagery and sound are low key but haunting, and afterwards I felt really calm and cleansed, like I'd done yoga or a long mediation session.

  14. I re-read the Foundation books recently. It's a bit dated now, but it made me laugh considering that we cannot even predict what will happen in 2 weeks time, let alone 1000 years.

  15. By the way, since we're talking films here, I'll mention something intriguing which I learnt from watching the German epic Heimat, (which follows the ups and downs of a village from 1918 to the late 60s) recently.

    There are lots of comparisons currently being made with the economic situation in the 30s, but what was noticeable was that the Germans, (and presumably other Europeans) only started getting access to credit in the 30s, (it was a novelty in the village in 1933 at any rate) when there was already a recession in swing.
    I'm not sure if this was a good thing or not, (WW 2 was about far more than just economics) but at the very least it's interesting to note that the debt cycle and economic cycle were out of sync that time around in contrast to now…

  16. Rob in 1,000 years it will still be the same but we'll be commenting on GOLEM MMXVIIVI's blog about the great Mars property bubble unless we can get the herd to look up for more than one second in the ad break beamed via wi-fi directly into the brain and show them hard bitesize facts in an easy format like a leaflet that's easy to read with a bit of colour. If we can do that Martin Luther King jr will be chuffed.

    He could see it, i can see it, i know G can see it and Robbie baby i know you can too.

  17. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    That makes sense.

    Most of France didn't use much credit either. They had debts and local monet lenders. But there was rent more than debt.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *