European ministers said the plans for making bond holders share the costs of restructuring wouldn’t come in to force until 2013 and so won’t affect bond holders concerned about Ireland’s immanent default. Seems weak but I don’t thin it is. I think it is clever and gives Euro politicians there first advantage over the bond markets.
I love the way things get worded. It sounds so grown up when in fact it is a long winded way of saying to the bond market, “If you do that again I’ll hit you.” Sentiments and playground strategies never really change, just the language we dress them up in.
Whatever the language, it says to me, Germany has finally put some backbone into her European partners. Up till now the bond market has had them running around like spineless cowards. Now the positions are slowly reversing. The point of the minister’s statement, and the point about 2013, is to say, whatever happens to Ireland and Greece, Spain will be very different boys and girls. The implied threat is – play nice now or lose everything when Spain comes to the bar.
The ministers, led by Germany, have said, let’s all talk like grown ups. Let’s cooperate and be nice about Ireland and Greece. We are willing to help but not to be your punch-bag. That is an invitation for the bond holders to respond in kind and say, ‘yes, let’s work this out’. If they don’t the Ministers have laid it out that in the future, when Europe’s forth largest economy might need help, then the unkindness will be repaid in hundreds of billions of spades.
The minister and leaders have just bought themselves time and taken it from the bond market. It is now clear to the market that losses are going to be taken and the mechanism will be put into European law to make sure of it. That will get priced in starting today. The pressure on the bond market from that threat will also start to have a salutary effect on the market now, today. The spread on Irish and Greek debt will not heal. Too late for that, but the bond market may get the message that intransigence now over Ireland may cost them dearly in future so maybe it will be better, albeit kicking and screaming, to play nicer.
I could be quite, quite wrong about this. I am arguing purely from the logic I would pursue if I were a European leader and pinning that to what I hear them saying.

Cannot Spain need rescue before 2013? Maybe it's better to access the "shock and awe" fund sooner rather than later, while there is still some left
Hello Lars,
nice to hear from you again. I think they could well need help before 2013. So all the more reason to starting bullying the bond holders now. Then if, as is likely, Spain does need help sooner you simply change the date and move it up top when you need it.
As for "shock and awe", they simply can't do it. Certainly not with the EFSF. Although it was trumpeted as €700 billion, because of the way it is set up they cannot spend anything like that much. And cannot spend it as freely as they might pretend. If they do they lose the EFSF's AAA rating, which weakens the EFSF over all.
The EFSF is not like the TARP. The TARP is a big fund, fairly easily accessed. The EFSF is set up very differently.
So I don't think they can simply back stop everything with it. That is why various groups in Europe are talking about setting up a European version of the IMF. A sort of EMF.
Europe does not want teh IMF involved if it can help it. An EMF would avoid that. BUT none of them can agree on who would control an EMF. So it is to be seen if they can get one set up.
In short it is still a terrible mess. The pressure on the bond holders is a good step, in my opnion, and in the mean time there is the solace that all the default rumours are weakening the Euro against the dollar undoing all of the FED's efforts.
Set up an EMF? Unbelievable!
I know Unclear. Sometimes I can't decide if we're in a tragedy or a comedy.
First, alarm in the market about possible haircuts, then:
"Any new [bailout] mechanism would only come into effect after mid-2013 with no impact whatsoever on the current arrangements." (Finance ministers' statement)
"Current arrangements", what can that be other than the EFSF (and/or IMF)?
Sounds deliberately misleading when implying that before mid-2013 all sovereign Euro debt is guaranteed against default.
Well, markets were calmed. Their shared brain is easily calmed and easily alarmed, and it will require new soothing words the coming week also….
Hi Golem,
Your book just pooped through the letterbox 5 minutes ago. Looks great! Now to get reading….
Thanks
Rob
Lars,
You made me laugh with your "shared brain"!
I htink they are misleading, and muddling on purpose. But as you say markets are slow, herd creatures easily spooked but with short memories and little imagination.
The flawed logic in todays joint statement of finance ministers, apparently underwriting all of the Euro-zone public debts to mid-2013, is shredded here
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jeremywarner/100008620/stranger-and-stranger-grows-the-eus-bailout-fund/
" If they do they lose the EFSF's AAA rating, which weakens the EFSF over all."
It's truly amazing that bond rating agencies are taken at all seriously anymore.