Fire Sale of Bank Assets beginning?

Earlier today in “Bank Blood Letting” I wrote,

Bank of America has lost lost $33 billion of its market value in a single week. Unless these losses are magically erased by spectacular gains, and soon, we will see forced selling of assets as banks try to raise capital.

A few hours later this from Reuters,

HONG KONG/DUBAI, Aug 10 (Reuters) – Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) has held exploratory talks with the principal investment funds of Kuwait and Qatar about selling part of its stake in China Construction Bank (0939.HK), sources with direct knowledge of the talks told Reuters.

Bank of America, which owns about 10 percent of CCB’s (601939.SS) Hong Kong-listed shares and is scurrying to raise capital for its mortgage-scarred balance sheet, will be contractually free to sell the bank shares after Aug. 29. They are valued at about $17 billion

The same article goes on to say that estimates are that BoA will need $50 billion to shore up its Tier One capital.

As ZeroHedge notes,

There are several problems with this approach: first, the petrodollar sovereign wealth funds just lost over 20% of their AUM courtesy of the global equity rout and of the plunge in oil by more than 20% in less than 2 weeks;

Quite. I would say we are seeing the beginnings of a fire sale.  And the thing about fires, is they spread.

China Construction Bank is itself not looking too healthy and will not appreciate what such a sale might do it own share price. Already this year one of Singapore’s state owned funds Temasek sold  $3.1 billion of China Construction Bank and this much smaller sale than the one proposed by BoA, sent China Construction Bank shares down by 3%. Bank of America’s sale of half or more of its $17 billion stake, if they can find a buyer, will have a greater impact.

Part of the reason Tamasek sold its holding was because,

… Moody’s warned of a possible ratings downgrade for Chinese banks due to their higher-than-expected exposure to local government debt. 

Just in case the point wasn’t clear enough the same article also includes this quote.

“I do not like the Chinese banks. My concern is that they may freeze their dividends,”Mark Matthews, head of research Asia for Swiss wealth manager Julius Baer, citing their exposure to local government debt.

I include this little quote from the article because Julius Baer is a very private and very clever Swiss bank. They were the ones, I was told by an acquaintance in Switzerland, who sold their portfolio of American clients to UBS just before the US authorities clamped down on Swiss banks harbouring US tax evaders. UBS found it had quite a few such clients. Julius Baer had none.

So if Julius Baer thinks Chinese banks in general are holding lots and lots of Local government debts which will default, who am I to argue. I think BoA will not have an easy time selling its shares and will not get the price for them it is hoping for.

All of which leads me to start wondering what other banks will try to sell?

I wonder if SocGen and Credit Agricole will try to sell off their joint East European Bond venture, Amundi,  which is is heavily exposed to Hungarian and Romanian debt? Or start selling its holdings? Or will Societie Generale try to sell its Romanian bank, BRD? And what about Raiffeisen or Erste both Austrian banks with large Hungarian and Romanian exposure? Or what about Bank Austria which is part of UniCredit and has exposure throughout Eastern Europe? UniCredit already tried to sell its huge American subsidiary, Pioneer, but decided not to after all, when there didn’t seem to be a rush of likely buyers.

European banks are running out of cash. They are not lending to each other – the Euribor is not looking good at all. They have all lost a shed load of their stock market value AND according to this rather good piece posted on ZeroHedge, American Money Market funds are pulling their cash from Europe. That leaves European banks without short term or medium term funding.

But if they do have to sell, and the above says they will,  they’ll be doing so in to a falling market which will depress the market further.

So far the Dow Jones has lost 1000 points in about three weeks and the slope of the downward curve is steepening.

7 thoughts on “Fire Sale of Bank Assets beginning?”

  1. ..First they came for Greece, then they came for Ireland, then…

    "Italy's leader Silvio Berlusconi lashed out at Europe yesterday after a leaked letter showed that the ECB had dictated the exact details of Rome's new austerity policies as a condition for ECB bond purchases.
    "They made us look like an occupied government. They bought the bonds to save themselves, not Italy," he said, according to Il Messaggero.
    "We're a long way from collective governance capable of scaring speculators. If it's our turn today, it can be Paris's turn tomorrow."

    David your predictions are all coming to pass…

  2. Closer and closer it comes

    "Commerzbank, Germany's second largest bank, suffered a €760m (£668m) loss on its Greek government debt holdings, almost wiping out its second-quarter profit"

  3. Crikey Golem! Thank you for trying to keep up with this whirlwind of developments. I am happy to reassure you that your bank armageddon scenario cannot possibly come to pass. Why?

    Well as recently as this last month I have been reassured by above and below the line commentators that the bank bail outs were a truly graet idea and we, the public, are going to make shedloads of money from these deals.

    I would ask them to come and explain to you why you are so wrong but they have mysteriously vanished or changed their user name.

    Never mind Golem, how could a man as humble as you ever hope to compete with the intellectual prowess of Tim Worstall and his fellow shills eh?

    I hope the fact that UK,EU and BoA banks shares have tanked so badly they are now referred to as the "panser division" has taught you how wrong you are.

    I do love satire. bill40

  4. @ wirplit

    "Good interview…"

    No, not really. Evans-Pritchard is yet another of the hordes of establishment economists/commentators who had nothing to say about the bubble/crash by way of warning (or any methodolgy to quantify/describe it). And equally feckall to say about their failure in that regard since. Why is that? Junk macro/monetary economic theory, that's what. Yet, like all the others, he still has the nerve to pontificate now.

    Statements like "…you have to balance the books..". Implying that fiat currency issuer authorities like UK gov or ECB must operate like a currency +user+ (household, private businesses) in the micro economy & use only interest bearing debt & be obligated to repay. This is complete rubbish, & the banks' numero uno scam.

    If Evans-Pritchard & the rest continue to apply this false paradigm that all money must be issued (public as well as private) as debt, ultimately all owed to private banks with interest, then yes, a sh1tstorm of trouble lies ahead in eurozone. But that's not exactly news is it? And nor are single currency jurisdictions like UK or US going to be far behind for the same reason.

    The fundamental problem of the 'solutions' thus far is the fact of throwing more debt (this time directly on taxpayers) onto a debt bubble crisis & somehow suggesting a 'growth fairy' will appear. (But at least in the meantime, the banks get to rake in (rob) as much cash as possible.)

    All this debt money created by private banks, free gratis, can only get repaid +one+ way. By productive activity in the real economy that is sufficient to increase monetary base & pay down debt.

    Sure, inflation can help too, but as the neo-liberals would rather eat their children (probably ours first) than suffer even moderate inflation of the wealthy elites' lucre, I think we can discount any significant amount of that if these w@nkers are left in charge.

    Debt free spending directly into the economy by governments/currency issue authorities (whether sovereign or monetary union) is the best way out of the mess for ordinary citizens & at the same time preventing the banks creating any more debt bubbles, once & for all. (And separate 'real economy' banking services entirely from the casino sector.)

    This assumes also that the banksters have indeed created the current system such that no major bank can fail without collapsing the lot. Thus excluding any substantial debt write offs that could add to the solution & should have, morally & by the 'rules' of capitalism, been able to occur.

    The right way to go for monetary & fiscal reform: (full reserve banking & 'MMT' economics)

    http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Submission-to-ICB-4-July-11-Positive-Money-nef-Soton-Uni1.pdf

    Modelling of such a system for Japan by Prof Yamaguchi: (note the 'debt' graphs going forward)

    http://www.monetary.org/yamaguchipaper.pdf

    Of course this is the last thing the banks want. It would expose the banksters' free lunch debt/money creation scam. They also stand to lose the hold over the democratic process (that isn't), that they have enjoyed in the shadows for so long.

  5. @ bill

    haha, well if it happens, you'll all know for sure I'm on the right track 😉

    …sh1t, what's that noise overhead?….

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *