Political killing season

Between September and November, in the UK and the US, we are going to have the Political Killing Season. We may also have it elsewhere but I haven’t given it enough thought yet.

From September onwards the reality of Cuts will start to make itself felt. So far they have not. But when the new school year opens it will raise the curtain on a new and unbelievably brutal reality. Even September will be just the start. For so many people, politics remains vague right until its consequences punch them in the gut. Schools and children’s services are where the first punch will be felt.

In the UK this will focus attention, for the first time, on the looming spending review aka social services slaughter-house. In the US they will be heading for the November mid terms. At which Obama will be shown to be a powerless president. Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t a dig at his colour or any other kind of knuckle-dragging idiocy. I know he spoke of change but financially I haven’t seen any. Voters saw him as the First Black President and had high hopes. And he is the first black president of the US. And that means something important. But in his actions he was and is, in my opinion, not so much ‘the first black man’ to become President, but more just ‘the latest in a long tradition of rich men’ who are always the President. The poor listened to him and voted for him. But Obama listened to the bankers and he voted for them.

I think the vote that turned out for him personally will not be there at the mid terms. The democrates are very likely to lose both Houses and if they do, Obama will be more on his own than he is now.

His position is very weak. The Banking lobby is already on the attack, determined to reduce the Financial Regulation Bill into even more of a travesty than it already is. The Bank Lobby’s argument will be a simple one. Obama and his team have done so well, with our help, BUT the recovery is fragile and they must not waver now. They must resist the urgings of malcontents who want to over regulate the banks because this will harm Amercia. These people want to harm the banks purely to satisfy their own personal hatred of Free Enterprise. America, they will say, must ‘believe in itself’ and stimulate for growth.

And what can Obama say to this? Obama and his team have already heaped a mountain of debt on top of that which they inherited. They have saddled Americans with the largest debt in history – Trillion upon Trillion. Can he turn around now and say the policy they spent all those trillions on, is now no good? How can he say that? His opponents on Washington and Wall Street would slaughter him. Obama is a hostage to his policies so far. Like an innocent man who makes the mistake of agreeing to do a small favour for the Mafia. That innocent man is then their creature. Obama sold himself when he agreed to bail them out.

Come September or November, he can’t simply say, ‘Oops, actually stimulus spending and bank bail-outs are a bad idea because it is ruining public finances’. He may as well – ‘Sorry I shot the kids.’ Obama has to be seen to be consistent. That gives him little space for arguing with the bank lobby and their pet media mouth pieces.

Come November I think Obama will become the lamest of Lame Ducks. The Lamer he gets the lower his ratings will fall. There is no one so despised as a fallen hero. The financial lobby will be unopposed.

Without a strong President the people of America had better look to themselves for help because no one else is going to be looking out for them.

In the UK it is my opinion that the Liberal Democratic Party committed political suicide when it signed up with the Conseratives. The Conservaitves struck a deal which, regardless of what papers were signed, gives them almost all the cards and the Lib Dems hardly any. The Conservatives can and will push for whatever cuts they want. What can the Lib Dems say? Were they not agreed that the situation was and is serious and cuts have to be made or the nation will collpapse? Yes they did. So if they now complain, how easy will it be to paint them as exactly the weak and pathetic LibDems we all suspected they were – they talk tough but when it comes to doing the man’s job they are boys found wanting. That is just too easy to spin at Tory HQ and in the Tory Press.

The Lib Dems will be seen as and despised for being the Tory’s hired help for carrying out a their agenda. The LibDems own support will melt away. It already is. What will be left is what was always there in the LibDems, a rump of the nice,-but-still- dim wing of the conservative voting public. They will be assimliated into the Tories and there will be no Lib Dem party after this parliament. This more progressive elements will be orphaned.

Basically, those who have done and continue to do the bankers bidding and carry out the bankers policies will be sacraficed by those they are helping. It’s classic.

4 thoughts on “Political killing season”

  1. theprofromdover

    Clegg is of course the wrong man *, but there is scope for the LibDems to claim they took on a share of power and responsibility, and want to have the balance of power next time as well (with whoever wins). If they ever had any hopes of attaining critical mass, LibDems had to go 'all-in' at this past election, either with a Brown-less Liebour, or a soft Cam-Tory party.

    * Unfortunately I haven't seen much sign of the right man in their ranks.

  2. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    I just think the deal they struck means they are going to be used to help the Tories screw people and will get the blame.

    As you say a strong leader might have been able to pull it off. But this bunch. Not a chance. End of the Lib Dems as a party.

    We have to have new leadership and quite possibly a new party.

    If the LibDems do manage to force a real vote on PR with rules for the vote that don't make a mockery of it – then they will not have died in vain and I for one will thank them.

  3. JamieGriffiths

    Anyone see Clegg interviewed in the Guardian this weekend? He described himself as a 'revolutionary' – I nearly sprayed cornflakes all over my paper.

    But after the initial hilarity had worn off, two things struck me as being particularly salient.

    First, he banged on about how he's so chuffed that British politics has moved beyond the old two party duopoly. That there's now so much more 'plurality, diversity and fluidity'. Isn't it just swell? Er, no. Have we ever seen less plurality in parliament? Less diversity? Not in my life time. Fluidity maybe. If fluidity means changing all your manifesto pledges as soon as you get a whiff of power.

    I agree that we've moved beyond a two party duopoly. Some time ago I'd say. We've now got a one party monopoly. The party of high finance. Which brings me to the other thing he said that stuck out:

    "He disclosed that conversations with the governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, and senior Treasury officials convinced him that "if you are an incoming government, especially if you are a coalition government, it is unbelievably important when you are facing a fiscal firestorm like this that you assert sovereignty and control over the situation, that you show you are going to deal with it on your own terms. You have a choice at the end of the day: do you want your government to try and sort out this mess or do you want faceless people in the bond market to force it upon you?"

    Does he not see the contradiction here? We don't want a decision FORCED upon us, so we better CHOOSE NOW! Have we slipped through the looking glass here? Does this statement not contain a tacit acknowledgement that 'they' are in control and that our elected representatives lie prostrate and powerless before them? That our 'democracy' is a sham? That voting makes absolutely no f**king difference whatsoever?

    If so, he seems very pleased with the situation doesn't he?

    Don't get me wrong – I'm not Clegg bashing from a party political viewpoint. This just happened to set off my bullshit radar on Saturday. I think this mindset is representative of the lot of them. Willfully deluded. Unable to acknowledge that they're not holding the reigns and therefore powerless to do anything about it.

    I hope you're right Golem. I hope this can't last.

  4. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    JamieGriffiths,

    Interesting post. Thank you. Agree it is a one party system. They all belive essentially the same things. All agreed what can be questionad and what can't. WHat the poeple can chose and what they can't. All share the same aasumptions.

    Leaving us with no choice.

    And to top it iff, as you say, they're not even in charge.

    Up to us to make sure it doesn't last. Step one is just to talk about it between ourslves to become confident in our thoughts. Step two tell others. Stpe three organize some fo the like minded.

    Step four…well three steps at a time isn't bad is it?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *