Ireland’s endless agony

If you go back and read the 2010 Irish budget as laid out in 09 and then the additional budgets since, you can see all the slashing and burning of public spending. All essential, the Irish people were told, in order to cut the budget deficit.  Around €5 billion in cuts.  All of which, every euro of it, has NOT been saved, has NOT been cut from the debt, but instead, was yesterday given to Ireland’s banks.

Think of it this way.  Let’s imagine the banks as somethig more ordinary – as land owners. Instead of loans, fields under cultivation. A huge mono crop of potatoes. Every loan a plant.  If a landowner had such a crop and it failed, blighted from leave to root, it would be a disaster.  What would have to happen?  Every field ploughed up, every plant burnt.

But not this time.  Oh, no. The banks aren’t some bunch of rough necked farmers. They have friends in government. SO what has happened to their blighted crop?  Well it has been harvested methodically as if nothing was wrong. One field after another of stinking, black slimy infection has been sacked up, and sold to YOU!  The government has paid the farmer for every last spade full.

Of course, they will say, some of it we have only paid 65 cents on the euro for it.  Why buy it at all? THAT is the question to which there is no answer beyond the intoned “we can’t frighten the bond market or else Ireland will be ruined”.  What you mean like Argentina was ‘ruined’ or Iceland is ‘ruined’?  That  kind of ruined?  Are those countries more ruined than Ireland is now and will be as the next year grinds on? Or have they somehow escaped this utter ‘ruination’ and found that actually, life and prosperity return? Or do the Irish politicians mean there is something darker they have not so far dared to mention? Some as yet completely unadmitted pile of debts?  Surely not.

If truth be told saving insolvent bankers is what all the austerity has been for.  It has NOT been about reducing public debt.  That cannot be the case because the debt has gone UP as a consequence of giving more and more money to the banks.

What would have happened, do you  think, if the Irish government and its Central Bank, had said to the Irish people, you must take wage cuts and pension erosion, have less spent on your children’s education and health – and you must do all this in order than we can give all the money to some insolvent banks?

Do you think people would have thought it was a good idea?  Would they have agreed? Or do you think people might have had a few questions they wanted answered first? And yet the politicians and bankers knew this was exactly what all the austerity was really for.  So they simply lied to their own people. Because there are questions about Ireland’s debts they will not, dare not, answer.

They told them the austerity was so that Ireland’s debts could be reduced and so that her borrowing costs could be contained. But that was a lie.  Because the money saved was not used to reduce Ireland’s debt. That debt has grown by tens of billions THIS YEAR. AND Ireland’s borrowing costs are now at or just below record levels.

Every ounce of suffering has been simply to bail out insolvent banks.  That is the bald fact.

Everything saved this last year was handed to Anglo Irish and Allied Irish yesterday and today. Simple as that.

And here is what really makes me angry.  Every time the banks have been bailed and re-bailed, the fatuous mottled politicians and greasey weasel banking experts, have said, “Oh that’s it now. Line in the sand. No more.” But it has always been more. hasn’t it?

And you know what  this isn’t the end either. And we can refer Mr Honohan of the central bank for conformation.  Because he knows even the current losses are based on ‘worst case scenarios‘ which are of losses on bank ‘assets’ of 70%.  Who says the losses will stop there? Would it be the same fools who assured us all the losses would remain below 60%?

And we can refer to Mr Lenihan, Minister for Finance, who said today that the deficit is more serious and dangerous than the bank crisis and therefore YET MORE cuts would be imposed.  A splendid piece of financial misdirection.  The deficit IS the banking crisis. Without the wasted billions spent on the rotting harvest of bank debts the Irish debt load would be a third of the size.

But the worst of Mr Lenihan’s sophistry is this.  The impression is always carefully given that once the latest round of bail out blackmail money is handed over, the banks are ‘saved’ from their losses and will ‘recover’.  NO THEY WON’T. And Mr Lenihan knows this.

How do banks make money normally?  They take deposits, lend and trade on the markets.  The Irish people are being bled of any money they make. SO there won’t be any profits from deposits. The banks have nothing and no one to led to, not in Ireland, for certain. Austerity has salted the earth and poisoned the wells.  And  as the global markets slow down in 2011 and beyond, as they are now doing, Ireland’s banks will make losses and fail. One trading house after another is filing returns showing catastrophic falls in income from trading. So no chance of salvation from there either.

Ireland is saving their banks from yesterday’s losses so they can wither and die all over again from today’s.  The Irish banks are bankrupt, enfeebled and facing hard financial times. Ireland is being bled dry to ”save’ banks just so that they can now make ‘ordinary’ losses and need to be saved from them in turn. Will the Irish government save them from those as well?

15 thoughts on “Ireland’s endless agony”

  1. Golem

    Can you recommend a video or website that describes the cause and aftermath of the 2007 crash to a layperson, please? Not an 'idiot's guide' but something that doesn't go too deeply into different types of derivatives etc.

    I'd like some help so that I make a 20-minute presentation of what's going on to some students.

  2. They make money off money which never was physically money just numbers on screens and syphon off a wedge to buy suits, cars, Lehman Brothers wall plaques and then when their fake money rollercoaster ride finishes expect the real world, the one that actually does stuff, physical stuff that you see around you day to day, real people to foot the bill of their fakery, but to pay the bill they need a time machine as there's not that much money. They need the human race to travel through time for years to amass enough real money to pay off their fake money while not using REAL money to pay for REAL things that REAL people need in their REAL lives.
    In the midst of this Bill Gates pipes up and says what do you want? Your nan to live for 3 months longer or 10 teachers to keep their jobs?
    If life is a bell curve excluding natural disasters, how can we the REAL people bring about the natural disaster to halt the slow decline (if that's where we're at on the curve) of our paper trail existence and stop it dead in its tracks because if we can't they'll just keep milking it till they can't no more, then they will bring it to a halt and usher in their new dream which will be our childrens new nightmare.

  3. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Hello John,

    I can't recommend a film that will do what you want. There may be one. I don't know it. I made a film jst as the crisis was starting laying out the underlying mathematics of why it would happen. But not the history of it. You can find it on Youtube. Called High Anxieties.

    Web sitew, blogs tend, like mine, to be reactive to events. So their over all thesis is scattered across many posts.

    Books you could try Michael Lewis's The Big Short, or Michael Lewis's The Big Short, The probelm fo me is that most books these more or less included are from within the broad concensus taht this is a liquidity crisis, I and many others think this is fundamentally and critically wrong. The crisis was and is one of solvency.

    I can only offer you a selection of posts which taken together might sketch out a coherent view. In case you're interested here they are more or less in order. I hope they help.

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/05/secrecy-and-control-bubbles-and-bankers.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/05/volatility-market-god-slayer-of-nations.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/05/non-linearity-ignore-it-at-your-peril.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/05/empty-sham-of-debt-backed-money.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/06/liquidity-lie.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/06/fractional-bank-ious-and-lies.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/07/short-selling-end-game-guide.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/07/speculation-and-bubbles.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/07/debt-pollution.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/08/securitization-ruptured-heart-of-shadow.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/08/undead-heart-part-two.html

    http://golemxiv-credo.blogspot.com/2010/08/undead-heart-part-three.html

  4. I saw today brucibaby ( a kiwi i think …) and another 'benhhor' or something , recommending the site, not just me …but thanks for the 'thought' about my roof !

  5. mudhutrentarrears

    John Aston,

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0&feature=player_embedded

    Check out this RSA Animate – Crises in Capitalism. It covers the openng gambits of the financial crisis in a very visually captivating and amusing way. @ 11 minutes long.

    "In this RSA Animate, renowned academic David Harvey asks if it is time to look beyond capitalism towards a new social order that would allow us to live within a system that really could be responsible, just, and humane? This is based on a lecture at the RSA "

  6. All this money that we have given to the banks . . .

    We easily can see where it comes from -we have less pay, the library is shut, the school has fewer teachers, the hospital has fewer doctors. Our government is hugely in debt, debt for which we & our children will have to work hard for years in order to pay off.

    But some people also wonder, this money we have just given to the banks, where does it go to??? I mean, where does it end up?

    The sad answer is that in fact, it goes to everyone. To the rich more than the poor, but actually , to everyone to some extent. Everyone has already had it.

    Remember all those years when the average working person could have computers and MP3s & new cars and fancy big TVs and a hugely overpriced houses, and holidays abroad on cheap jets, while just doing a normal days work??

    Well, that's where the bailout money went. We've had it already. A bubble-loan from the future, to buy useless crap in the present. Of course, the richest 1% got most of it and used it to buy land or factories or whatever you do if you're really rich – but actually everyone had some of it too.

    The party's over, this is the bill for it now. Of course, we were not told we would have to pay, we were told that things were just great – economic growth (having more stuff every year than the year before, without working harder) was natural and in fact our _right_ .

    Very few challenged this concept. Maybe people will slowly start to question a few more assumptions about how they expect the world to work.

  7. I don't agree that the refusal of politicians throughout the Western World to act in their electorates' interest is a crisis of Capitalism. It is a crisis of Democracy. The root cause of this mess is us, the voting public, because those in office are chosen by us to represent us.

    On that I am clear. Unclear.

  8. @Unclear
    Democracy works fine when a broad spectrum of people are listened to. I don't think they can hear the little people. Everything is so damn quiet.

    In the film that 'dave from france' recommends, David Harvey makes the outrageous claim that the working class (need a better phrase for this) were handed mortgages so that they would be less likely to go on strike. Despite the silliness, it does highlight an important point, that people are less likely to protest when they think there will be dire consequences.
    I find it interesting that there was more hoo-ha about the ban on fox hunting than the bank bail outs.

    The mind abounds with mutually exclusive conclusions!

    Have a great weekend y'all.

  9. Hi RichGB,

    I was encouraged somewhat by Ed M's speech to conference in which he seemed to making the point that the previous government had disregarded the public. Could this become a political theme across the political spectrum? One can but hope. So maybe this election result represents a turning point – towards greater accountability and representation.

    The Harvey claim isn't outrageous except in the inference that it was solely done for the purpose of subduing the labour force. I agree with you (and him) about the consequences.

    In fact there was much I agreed with in the film, except I reject the idea that it is Capitalism that tries to circumvent barriers and obstacles; it is politicians who do that in order to bend and distort an economic system in order to achieve their short term political objectives. It's like tying knots in a high-pressure hose.

    Off to pick some blackberries now, or 'foraging for food' as it will become known.

    As ever, Unclear.

  10. Unclear,

    I don't think it's possible to draw such a clear distinction. All the politician's world-views are based entirely upon the short termist capitalist derived orthodoxies of the type that prompted the hubris of Francis Fukuyama (in pronouncing the 'end of history') and of Gordon 'no more boom and bust' Brown. These views are entrenched by paying attention only to very recent history and being surrounded by the wealthy whose financial clout grants them access.
    The politicians are the medium through which capitalism distorts our political life.
    The political objectives of our elected leaders are determined by the needs of capital. It gets into our democratic institutions through tiny holes like lax campaign funding laws and the threat of taking jobs overseas and gradually widens these holes, exerting it's power over the legistlative agenda (cf. the Digital Economy Bill) and the rule of law (cf. BAE and the Saudis) until what you end up with is fascism of one form or another.

    I don't think you can blame individual political actors for being unable to resist the massive forces of international capital. Not when our constitution is so massively flawed as to practically invite this kind of interference.

    BTW thanks for your mention of Kondratiev the other day. Hadn't heard of him before – really interesting stuff.

  11. Hi JamieGriffiths, I'm glad you had a look at the Kondratiev story, it deserves to be known wider; it seems we are destined to repeat the sins of our great-grandfathers.

    We are just going to have to agree to disagree on the role of politicians. I do blame political actors for being unable to act in their electorate's best interest.

    Succumbing to the needs of Capital, to religeous mania, to the cult of celebrity, to hypocricy, to the desire for an exclusive education for their children. It's up to us, we can say "No" to anything we don't like about our politicians.

    We didn't.

    Always, unclear.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.