The Gathering Storm – Part 1

Sorry for the silence but there is so much to read, things breaking so thick and fast, that it seems unwise to rush to judgement.  So consider this just a dispatch from the storm front.

Any of you who have been watching the gyrations of the markets over the last week will have seen, as I have, the warning gusts that precede an approaching storm.  Stocks surging up and plunging down. Apple, riding waves of turbulence up, down and up again.  Netflix, rising like a rocket, propelled faster and faster until it reaches, as it must, its parabolic moment of stillness before its fall.  Fools see only the upswings and seem blind to the significance of the down blasts.

This isn’t recovery. This is the in-rushing, gathering of opposing forces into what is going to be a vicious thunderhead of social, financial and legal violence.  I truly believe the storm is now above us, still growing, threatening and darkening.

It is the same storm as in ’08. It has gathered again, because we have let it.

The centre of it, is STILL, U.S. mortgage backed securities.  NOTHING has been done about them.  And nothing has been done, because they are the currency that the immense debt-denominated wealth of our rulers is held in.

The actions taken in the last two years have NOT been primarily about recovery.  They have been first and foremost, about protecting, not just the treasure hoard of debt backed wealth itself, but much more importantly, it has been about vociferously defending the legitimacy of the financial system that is based on , creates and is made all powerful by, debt backed securitized wealth.

The last two years have been about  fighting off any questioning of the legitimacy of the system of securitized, debt backed wealth. But the system of securities and debts is once again in critical danger of disintegrating. The securities and the system that created them are literally unravelling.

It may seem perverse, lunatic even, to make such a claim while markets are endlessly rising and governments are succeeding everywhere in pushing through crippling cuts to better protect the pyramid of debts and power.

But beneath the surface, the basic elements of which it is all made, the securities, are being pulled apart as one aspect after another of their legal force is being questioned and taken to court.  There are now so many different claims and evidence of fraud it is difficult to know where to start.

So let us begin with a thumb nail reminder of the system as is.  At the centre the banks. To their left the people to whom they sold mortgages and from whom they expect mortgage payments.  To their right the people to whom they sold securities based on the mortgages.  The securities buyers paid the banks an up-front lump sum in return for receiving all the rights to payments from the mortgage and rights over the property in case of default.  The banks used the lump sum payment to make more mortgages.

The legal title of the mortgage passed from the banks to the security holders.  Most mortgage buyers, the householders, were unaware of this transfer and to whom they actually owed their money and who actually ‘owned’ the legal right to their payments and their house if they defaulted.

The banks were the middle men in the transaction.

What is happening now is that every single stage in this legal and financial process has been found to be faulty or fraudulent – depending on whose lawyer you read.  Here are just some of the problems uncovered.

The first one concerns a woman called Linda Green. According to The Washington Post,

In Georgia, an employee of a document processing company, Linda Green, for years claimed to be executives of Bank of America , Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank and dozens of other lenders while signing off on tens of thousands of foreclosure affidavits. In many cases, her signature appeared to be forged by different employees.

Linda Green didn’t work for one of these banks after another. She managed to work for them at the same time.  What she did for all of them was sign, as responsible bank employee, on mortgage papers. Her signature was part of the process of the  banks ‘checking’ that all claims made in the mortgages were correct and title was legally able to be transferred.

Linda Green is known to have signed hundreds of thousand of such documents for twenty different lenders.  Her rate of signing was around 2000 per day.  Which, if she signed non stop for ten hours a day five days a week is one every 18 seconds.  In that time she had to do the due diligence the law requires and which the bank guarantees to its customers, the securities buyers, it has done. Which everyone had better hope she did somehow do in those few seconds, because in 2009 alone, according to Lynn Syzmoniak, just working out the signatures per second, Linda Green probably processed over $127 billion dollars worth of mortgages.

A prodigious feat of stamina and dedication – or fraud. You decide. Also, unfortunately, Linda Green didn’t actually sign.  It turns out many different people, with strikingly differing signatures, signed Linda Greens name.  Which is fraud.

And Ms Green is not alone.  Again from Ms Syzmoniak’s work:

Jeffrey Stephan from the GMAC may have produced as many as 2,000 Assignments each day. Bryan Bly of Nationwide Title Clearing – 2000/day, Scott Anderson, sweated out an average of – 2000/day. Herman John Kennerty of America’s Servicing Company – the same. Erica Johnson-Seck, Christina Trowbridge, Whitney Cook, Stacy Spohn, Keri Selman and Renee Hertzler. All of them ordinary Americans, their names could be from any high school year book. They all all part of an endemic culture of fraud.  As the scale of the ‘robosigning’ as it has come to be called, has unfolded the Big Banks have been forced to halt foreclosures.

Which is a dire turn of events for those banks.  Because the banks sold the mortgages in the form of securities.  The securities owners are owed money. They are expecting a steady flow of payments from the mortgages inside the securities. That can only happen one of two ways.  The people pay or the mortgage owner forecloses and gets money from selling the house.  BUT to foreclose you have, obviously, to be able to prove that you are actually the legal owner of said mortgage.  You can’t just walk in off the street and claim to own it. You have to have some proof. Otherwise any chancer could claim to own the mortgage. AND therein lies the problem.  The documents were either not signed when they should have been signed, or when they were signed were they not done legally, or both.  So there is no documented proof.
BoA, one of the banks at the centre of the storm, stopped foreclosures in 23 states and then all of them, after several cases were thrown our of court by judges saying – where is your proof? Where are the documents?  This left the bank crippled. Its shares started to disintegrate.  The bank said it would investigate. Mere weeks later it declares hundreds of billions of dollars worth of mortgages and securities are fine. No evidence of fraud.  Repossessions to re-start.
40 States’ Attorneys General are not so sure and are now investigating systemic mortgage and securities fraud.  Those are the highest legal council of the States.  The Attorney General for the state of Ohio,  Richard Crodray, who was the first to file against the banks, issued this statement in response to BoA restarting foreclosures in his state

“While I would not presume to speak for all 50 state attorneys general, from my own standpoint, we will want to be very careful in reviewing whatever their revised process purports to be….You have to remember, these are the same people who have essentially acknowledged that they committed fraud in perhaps tens of thousands of cases. Now they tell us that they have fixed the problem in a matter of weeks. We are certainly not just going to take their word for it.”

That was reported by Bloomberg on the 19th.  The next day MarketWatch ran this headline,

WHITE HOUSE SEES NO ‘STRUCTURAL’ FORECLOSURE ISSUE                              Nation’s top housing official repeats opposition to foreclosure halt.

The White House itself weighing in, repeating its, “opposition to a national foreclosure moratorium so that the ‘fragile housing recovery that has begun can continue.'”

The White House went on to say, it sees no evidence “yet” of systemic violation of property rights.   Basically they are saying this is a large but entirely clerical piece of sloppy record keeping.

On one side we have the States wanting to protect their citizens from having their houses seized by banks who cannot provide documents to prove they have any right to the house and also want to protect their own State revenues.  On the other side we have the Federal Government who are apparently convinced that the only way to really protect the citizens is to protect the cash flow of the banks and thereby avoid massive bank losses.

You can already see how the States and the Fed are no longer on the same side.  We now have the People and States versus the Feds and Big Banks.  If this was the only confrontation and these the only questions we would be laughing. But they aren’t.  These are just two of the  parts of the mechanism that have started to move.

The next part takes this question of clerical error or fraud and makes it explosive.

The simple question asked is this. Is there any reason why not just one bank but all of them, not just one part of the securitizing chain of businesses, but all of them,  would allow such rampant ‘clerical’ malpractice? And the answer seems to be – the clerical error was there to cover over a far more serious and actual fraud.  How can we possibly suggest such a thing?  Because some of the banks involved have started to file suits accusing each other of exactly that.

I will continue this in the next part. There should be three parts altogether. Taking it from single signatures, through national level fraud up to its international and political consequences. Because that is where we are now.  Financial crisis in nations are increasingly determining and provoking political confrontations between entire nations.

12 thoughts on “The Gathering Storm – Part 1”

  1. Really great piece Golem, and I say that as the editor and publisher or your book. Look forward to reading the next parts

  2. Thanks for a clear explanation of the problem Golem.

    It's all quite ludicrous, like attempting to counterfeit currency merely by photocopying it. Surely the banks with their sophisticated teams of lawyers and analysts could have had the foresight in these last two years to predict that this would all unravel.
    They must be supremely arrogant in their confidence that governments will bend to their will. It makes me re-consider those conspiracy theories regarding hidden agendas of unelected World governments.

  3. I still fear that pressure from the federal govt will result in state AGs eventually just waving thousands & thousands of foreclosures through court, under the pretense of "problem solved." The last governor to attempt to put a spanner in the works of mortgage fraud was Eliot Spitzer. We know what happened to him.

  4. Counterfeiting currency by photocopying isn't ludicrous, it's genius. i have a friend who always bangs on about forged twenties. He showed me one they were printing up the valleys (not involved may i add), near perfect with silver except for no raised writing, paper not waxy enough and the foil line was not all the way through when you held it up.

    Linda Green the human servant (got a song about her half finished for you Rich, to do with your stakes 😉 ) That had nothing to do with the forgery as such, as nobody knew what her signature looked like ( we all know a £20).
    That's all about the trust, faith in the system.

    But when profit has the most gravity, compassion, empathy, profit for the soul and trust are forgotten in the animal drive.
    I'm sure alot of these bankers did it to help their own families get ahead, basic drives uncluttered. Like drunks on a saturday night, blinkered with their lizard brains switched to turbo.

    Is evolution brought around by harsh events? Resistant Superbug making little Johnny sick because his mum tries to wipe everything out with chemicals.

    If so for us to evolve it's gotta go bang and then we see who wins.

    The Empire, guest starring Barry Soetoro and his Bildeberg mates or the masses.

    That's evolution, evolution with an R

    Good name for the album

    http://www.myspace.com/strangetowncollective

  5. They've so crassly cheated the system with little thought for finesse. Are the bankers now so rich that they are bored?

    It reminds me of a kid losing interest in a sophisticated toy. There's only one thing left to do with that toy – let's break it open and see how it works! Bum! It won't go back together! Better hide it under the bed and hope Daddy does not notice. I saw him sharpening sticks in the garage.

  6. OK here's a serious suggestion as an alternative to QEII.

    Instead of creating QE pounds, lets create a parallel currency (call it kilos, GBK for short) and issue QE of that instead.

    Make it legal tender, 1GBK = 1GBP in all respects except it is not valid for payment of taxes.

    Now the GPK will have a higher velocity than GBP, and businesses will not accumulate them as they would have to pay 30% corporation tax on them but cant use them to pay it!

    So the GBK will actually be spent, and spent again, and again without all ending up in a bank.

    If you wanted to be really cunning you would say they couldn't be used for foreign exchange or interest payments either, so the QE stayed local and didn't disappear offshore.

  7. Anyone here able to help me understand? I'm fairly sure I 'get it' with how MERS tracks the mortgages that make up a CDO.

    I understand the current issue as to whether the internal MERS assignation of ownership can be reconciled with the actual paper-based ownership or not. And I see why this was useful to the securitization process.

    But what I am really struggling with is CDO-squared. Once you make CDOs of CDOs, how does that affect the (alleged) title in MERS??? Surely there are then two claims on the same property?

    And is there some sort of second system of tracking like MERS somewhere? E.g. does each MERS entry in fact somehow suffer from the same problem that the mortgage deeds suffer from ?

    Ben, now confused, just when it all seemed so clear .. .

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.