The Ugly Sisters – PART 2 – The Misery-go-round

The purpose of these two articles is to argue that because of the particular way in which our financial system evolved before the debt collapse and the actions taken thereafter to bail out the banks and protect their debts, we are now seeing both inflation and deflation in different parts of the economic system. I started to sketch out how I think these two ‘opposing’ forces have begun to re-enforce each other.

The spiral up out of control

The banks demanded, got and used money bled from us and our society to replace their own lost income, in order to pay the debts they could not pay themselves.  The first round of bail outs merely replaced the bank’s lost capital flow. It saved them but left them still fairly penniless and thus unable to return to profitability. So a second round of bail outs was bled from public spending, as well as another ongoing undeclared bail-out in the form of continuous bond purchases.  QE2 and the ongoing bond purchases are always carefully referred to as ‘continuing support for the financial system’, in order to make it sound gentler, like a companionable arm extended to an infirm friend, instead of just a  ‘bail out’ which in fact is what it is.

No matter how the truth is disguised, however, by softening language, the brute and politically unpalatable reality beneath, is that the public have been made to shoulder the iron burden of paying the bank’s private debts and, moreover, of then being forced to give the banks yet more capital in order that they should again have the means to start to make profits.  Which if you are one of those who insist that these particular banks must be saved at any and all cost then a perfectly logical policy it is too.  But by following this ‘save the bankers’ policy, a strange thing has happened to democracy and the power relation between government and finance.

All the governments who bailed out their insolvent banks have found that the costs have spiralled up and up far beyond the bankers confident initial estimates and show no sign of stopping. This has been brutally clear in the case of Ireland, Greece and Hungary and is becoming evidently true for Spain and Portugal. It will in time also be seen to be true for the UK and the US.   As these costs have gone up it has meant ever greater growth would be required to pay back the ever greater amounts of money spent.

The whole policy we have followed had two parts. Save the banks from imminent death and then re-coup the cost by returning the banks to profit.  But the greater the costs the greater the profits will have to be AND the faster they will have to be made. And this time factor is where we are now and is the bit of the plan that has failed utterly and is now killing us.

QE1 was supposed to stabilize the banks and their losses and return them and the broader economy to growth. It didn’t. Time ticked on and payments on the first round of borrowed and printed cash for the bail outs, has started to come due. QE2 also failed to make the banks whole or to bring back confidence and growth. In fact, since the second round of printing and bail outs, forecasts of growth have been revised down. Except for the last quarter of last year when they went up, only to crash down again this quarter.  And this sorry state of financial diarrhoea has left governments mired in their own rancid and stinking lies.  Stock markets have gone up but not anything else.  The wealthiest have become wealthier while 42 million other Americans must rely on food stamps and charity to feed their children while public services are poisoned and uprooted around them. Housing continues down and unemployment continues up; especially the long term unemployed and the under-employed (meaning those who have found work but not enough to pay their bills).

Governments have squandered trillions – the wealth of a generation – upon a policy which has not worked. What should they do? If they were men and women of honour and courage they would admit they were wrong and stop. But they won’t. They are too afraid and too in the pocket of those few who have benefited from the general debacle – the bankers.  The result is that the bankers find they have not just regained the power they had but are in a more powerful position than before.

The bankers have our cash, we have their debts. They are now in less of a hurry than we are.  Our governments are desperate for the banks to make outsized profits because we need them to repay what they have taken from us. They, already having our money, feel in less of a hurry.

A complete and perfect outcome for the banks.

The governments are now more powerless and more clearly supplicant than before. This outcome was perfectly foreseeable from the start. But apparently not to our politicians or central bankers.

Now that it is we who need to the banks to make huge profits and make them fast, have you noticed how the whole discussion of banking and the recovery has changed? Not long ago there was talk of tighter regulation, curbing bonuses and even of banning riskier, unregulated practices.  Where has all that talk gone?  Once, talk of policies was all explicitly in terms of stimulating and lending into the broader economy.  All that talk has faded discretely away. Now it is all about ‘letting the banks get on with what they do best’. It is about ‘cutting the red tape’, the bureaucracy and public spending.  Desperately needed and necessary regulation has become  ‘over-regulation’ and there is to be none of that. Where, for a brief moment, ‘Too big to fail’ was a systemic danger we had to deal with, now it would be ‘unthinkable’ to put the banks at competative disadvantage and anyway the bankers have re-grouped and told the  politicians that big isn’t bad after all, it’s positively good and in fact vitally necessary, and that there can simply be no restriction on their bonuses or on whatever risks they care to run with our money.

Now, albeit as yet discretely, our governments are actually encouraging the banks to take the money we have given them and to do whatever they want with it, hurt whoever they have to with it, so long as they make outsized profits.  But even this rank and rotten capitulation is not working for our deeply stupid leaders.

For there are no outsized and quick profits to be made from investing for a long term and sustainable future here at  home.  Outsized and rapid profits come from speculating not investing.  And so the banks have exported our money and are using it to speculate on anything and everything.  In 08 they speculated on food and profited. A few people starved but so what.  They speculated on the currencies and the debt loads of the nations who had bailed them out. And ordinary tax payers found public services being pulled up by the roots in order to service the extra debts. But again so what.  What is more important to our political class, bankers profits and the city sinecures the bankers have promised them, or people’s lives?

Our banks have started to make profits but not from investing here. They have been making money from raping other countries.  A tide of hot money provided by you and me, has swept in to emerging nations like locusts upon a harvest. Brazil was clear that ‘we’ in the west were waging a currency war upon them and other emerging economies like them.  Our governments have said nothing and done even less.

But did this rape and plunder actually even ‘help’ you and me?  Well no it did not. Because the bankers, with the help of that other group of moral degenerates, the big accounting firms, long ago made sure that the banks would book all the profits from such pillage, in low or no tax haven and pay virtually no taxes here.

That was last year.  This year it is not just food but oil as well. Any opening, any natural unrest or volatility has been seized upon and amplified by the bankers and speculators, a hundred fold with the billions we have given them.

And so where might we be headed?

The bankers bail-out fueled speculation has driven price rises. It caused spikes in  food prices in 08 and again this last year.  The banks and other speculators made handsome profits but also caused some unintended consequences. Prices of the staple foods, wheat, barley and rice all shot up. Those countries across North Africa and the middle East which have seen riots and revolution are nearly ALL in the top ten importers of wheat on a per capita basis.  Food prices were a major part of why they rebelled. Once unleashed, however, the tide of unrest has unsettled more countries.  Saudi is now surrounded by unrest and by Shiite discontent.  In Yemen the government has murdered its own people and in Bahrain Shia Sunni tension is simmering.  All this precipitated in part at least, by the bankers ruthless pursuit of volatility and rapine speculation.

The blind profit-maker continues to hurt everyone including himself. For unrest caused by food price  has led in turn to oil prices shooting up. The bankers, utterly unable to restrain their personal greed for their collective good, have inflated this market too.   Two weeks ago oil speculators had futures contracts for about 269 million barrels of oil.  Which is a huge number even for the oil markets.  And by the beginning of last week they had added about another 400,000 to  500,000 barrels to that total.  The number of speculative contracts is now far greater than the number there were in 2008 when oil shot to $147 a barrel.

Till now economists have noted that all our printing of hot money has led to inflation being exported so that other countries have endured the pain. Now some of that pain is washing back home.  And as it does so it is interacting with deflation.  As inflation causes rises in food and petrol/diesel prices it is doing so in an environment of falling wages and rising unemployment, where people have to respond to prices rises by cutting spending elsewhere.  Higher food and petrol are simply eating in to any hopes people had for saving for a down-payment, cutting their debt load or even for paying the mortgage they already have.  Household debt is still huge but it is not there because people are continuing to buy their consumer heaven.  It is there because people are using credit to put off just a little longer the day when they cannot pay at all.

Higher oil prices are also interacting with deflation in another unpleasant way.  Since there are few larger single factors in determining the costs of trade and manufacture than energy inputs, a rise in energy of the scale we are now seeing, means growth projections are all shot to tatters.  Growth in almost all countries will be revised down.  With higher prices for food and fuel, growth will collapse, and without growth taxes and employment will both fall further and national debt payment schedules and attempts to lower national and banking levels of debt will all be missed. As people get poorer so their ability to pay back the debts they owe to the banks will decline further. The value of all the assets held by the banks will be called further in to question since their value depends on people being able to pay them back.

As inflation goes up, so people’s ability to pay their debts will decline.  If they fail to pay, then  the assets based on the debt being paid will deflate. Inflation could therefore kick deflation in debt-backed assets into a higher gear. If that happens the bond markets and CDS markets will all raise their demands, driving nations nearer to the inflexion point where debts run away from ability to service them.  As that point is approached nations will have to raise what they offer to the bond markets.  This in turn will mean borrowing costs within those nations will start to rise as their own banks have to pay more to borrow on the open markets and from their own national banks and even from the ECB or FED. Once the banks have to pay more to borrow so will their customers, the lowly house buyer. And once that happens it will cause a huge deflationary pressure on the housing market, house values and the banks and shadow banking system who still hold hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars worth of debt backed paper assets all still held at mark to model values.  All of which boils down to – BOOM, game over.

The bottom will drop out of the housing and commercial property markets again. The banks will find another damned-up lake of toxic sludge bursts its banks and floods the nation with more suffocating losses.  As the banks face more deflation of their asset values and destruction of the debt based wealth they will call for more bail outs and use whatever cash our idiot politicians give them to chase even more rapid profits which will mean even riskier and more destructive speculation. Which will create even more bubbles which will raise more inflationary waves some of which will wash home – and round and down will go the misery-go-round. Nations will be called upon for another round of even more catastrophic bail outs for the dying banks but they won’t be able to because their own debts will be too large.

Of course this is just one possible scenario. The bankers will have far rosier ones.

27 thoughts on “The Ugly Sisters – PART 2 – The Misery-go-round”

  1. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Yes, Japan is in a bad way in every respect and on every time scale. I'll also be interested to see what this does to shares in the nuclear industry and companies like GE.

  2. Don't forget the the stealth bailout of the banks. The various TARPS and QEs are the overt official supports of the banks.

    But the more insidious threat is the preferential treatment our politicians are affording the banks in the form of allowing them to disregard mark to market accounting rules.

    This seemingly innocuous bit of legislation means that banks can appear solvent. In turn this means that the rating agencies can maintain their AAA investment ratings for the banks.

    As AAA investment rated entities in an environment of rolling bankruptcies, the banks can now attract institutional funds… that would be, amongst other things, insurance and pension funds…. your insurance and pension funds….

    So, whatever may be left of the funds individuals think they may be entitled to are being plowed into entities that are in fact living dead zombies. Hence the reason why, inter allia, bankers are not only awarding themselves huge bonuses (bonuses are paid out of total turnover rather than out of net profits) but are also generally net sellers of equities by a far greater margin than at any time in the past twenty years.

    However, fear not. The denouement is at hand.

    When critical numbers of the alienated and disenfranchised, the unemployed, the homeless and the hungry will be roaming the streets looking for some politician and/or banker to lynch, our leaders will conveniently plunge us into a global conflict to fight a foreign evil that is undermining our way of life.

  3. Hi Golem,

    Thanks for your excellent take on the inflation/deflation debate.

    Very interesting framing it in terms of bubble assets traded in bankers' debt based & securitised currency and then assets traded in government backed hard cash. Since reading your book & blog I have become convinced of this uncontrolled bankers' currency – seperate to the conventional critique of fractional reserve banking. Haven't seen anyone else quite looking at it this way.

    Spinning vortices, vicious spirals and reinforcing feedback loops.. curiouser and curiouser it becomes. Parodoxically and ironically(though perhaps perfectly normally) the more one tries to avoid facing reality, the swifter and harsher it imposes itself.

    I can't help but feel that the efforts to mitigate the financial crisis will in fact hasten to bring about an ever greater radical reimagination of economics. Likewise climate change disasters themselves will do more to mitigate human behaviour effecting climate change than any eco-policy campaigns or conferences have – yet everything plays its part, no seperating parts from the whole, nor causes from effects, all inextricably connected.

    What has happened to humanity that we have so lost our vision, our intuition, our responsibility to the generations to come that we will not alter course until we slam into brick walls?

  4. Golem,

    When it all get's too much for me and when the flow of disinformation seems to overwhelm the senses, you have a knack of cutting through all the bullshit and rationalising it in a way that seems so simple.

    I know it is not simple to achieve this so thank you for what you are doing

    Steve

  5. It all sounds inevitable but is there anything that can be done (In your opinion)on a basic practical basis to stop all this before the hungry hordes start roaming the streets looking for a politician/banker to lynch?

  6. Hey Golem,

    Are you really saying that speculation is causing the long term trend prices of commodities to increase? In one of your recent postings you explained how speculation in commodities can strongly push up the prices paid by those with the weakest bargaining position. It is remarkable to see the spikes that can occur in commodity prices, and I can believe investors manipulate markets to create maximum volatility. But surely it is the long term macroeconomic situation which sets the long term price and what is meaningfully termed inflation?

    As destructive as this speculation is, it cannot cause sustained inflation. It is like the shrill voices on either the climate change debate who point to a cold winter and say 'there is no global warming' or a hot summer or a bad hurricane and say 'this was caused by man'. No, those are weather events, climate is on a bigger scale, over a longer time period. Likewise inflation, surely?

    One thing I can imagine is that the additional volatility will lead to an increase in hoarding, longer term contracts and basically any kind of behaviour which hedges against the volatility caused by speculation. Those activities could cause a short burst of inflation as the increased volatility becomes an integral component of macroeconomic expectations. In this respect the very problem now caused by speculation may lead to greater caution and better long planning, which may not be entirely bad things in themselves.

    On an entirely separate note:

    Recently, Guidoromero raised the point about interest rates being on a long downward curve (we're talking about the last fifty odd years here). If you compare the inflation data over the fifty years it is massively volatile. Now ever since this crisis kicked off the interest rate has dropped well below the rate of inflation, so effective interest rates have been negative: Banks are paid to borrow money. Does anyone know if this is a unique situation in history? How negative can effective interest rates go?

    It feels to me that to talk about growth or interest rates (or growth expectations and yield curves if we consider time) separately from inflation somehow paints a one dimensional picture, inflation is the baseline against which to measure the real rate of growth or cost of borrowing. Is this how we will achieve a return to 'growth'? If people fall for this then they are even more desperate to be deceived than I thought.

  7. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Morning David Lloyd,

    You are quite correcdt that sustained inflation is set by long term trends. Of course. But as you explore yourself the increase in volatility created by speculation does start to become one of the shapers of those longer term trends. And don't forget that the classic 'revert to the mean' model so beloved of lineear economists is just wrong. The world does not always revert to the mean. The world is non-linear and thus has discrete and oten irreversible branch points and junctures. So a small movement can be what pushes the system down one path or another.

    As for low interest rates we should ask Japan how well its working for them as a long term solution.

  8. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Ahimsa,

    You are right I am out on a limb on my own with the idea of teh bankers creating their own currency.Some bankers I've put it to, accept the idea others don't. SO it is worth remembering that this is just an idea I have found very useful for being able to explain to myself what has happened and why. BUT I could be wrong. It's just my idea not in any way accepted wisdom. Just worth remembering.

    I agree with you that reality is going to sort this out in the end. I just would like us to at least see clearly what is happening,so that even if we can't stop those with power from destroying things, we will understand how we got to where we end up and maybe that will help us do better there-after.

  9. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Guido,

    Thanks for reminding people of the depth of the complicity that is involved. A lot of people have a lot to answer for. And hopefullly they will be called to account.

  10. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    zardoz3006,

    I think the info looks solid and is what it purports to be. What it boils down to, for me, is how much of the rule of law do those in power think they can convinve the part of the public who are already angry, to accept can be set aside. They will have to argue that the situation is so serious, the knot of malfeasance so gordian, that it can't be undone, it must be cut through.

    The more illegality and straight fraud that is brought to light the more difficult this argument is to make. The whole MERS, robosigning, forclosure and securitization fraud is already a vast and oozing mess. Add another intentional fraud to deceive the regulators and the attemtps to sweep it all away get more difficult. The longer this drags on the less likely they are to win because the more it become set against a background of mounting public pain and suffering.

    Thye banks have been doing everything they can to buy-off the Attorney Generals of the States. And they have been making progress. This sort of thing sets back those efforts in a delightful way.

  11. Ha ha ha ha ha … shit! Well put, for the global context. I have been trying to explain (with no joy) to people here in Ireland for the last two years why Ireland is unsaveable. It's the same argument as yours minus the eloquence. Its actually quite simple, isn't it? Morgan Kelly and David McWilliams have also said the same thing, but since they predicted the bust they must now be ignored. After all they are economists, what would they know. Better to hand the economy over to a barrister or a teacher (previous minister for finance was barrister, new one is a teacher, how Irish is that?). So anyway, I just think that the main flaw is that the banks must become profitable. Banks are there to service the economy, not to be it. If the big 6 on Wall St really are 65% of GDP as Simon Johnson points out, then the yanks must have been playing this game for quite a while.

  12. Thanks, as ever, David, for your excellent posts shedding light where it's sorely needed 🙂

    From an engineering background, I've tended to view things as analogous to control & feedback loops – that is 'incentives' & the expression (market) 'signals' that economists use.

    There are two basic ways of making a living. Using our labour to earn a wage or using 'wealth' to sit on our arses & get others to do it for us. The former is most of us, the latter barely 10 or 20 million worldwide. In just about all human affairs these two basic groups stand firmly opposed – the interests of one group is antithetical to the other.

    Perversely, all 'mainstream' political leaders either are, or reasonably expect to become makers of their income by 'wealth', not employment. Diametrically opposed to the vast majority of us. Even tho' the global financial crisis has laid bare for all to see what side of the fence political leaders are actually on (their own of course & others of their 'wealth' class), the world still pretends such perverse 'incentivisation' = meaningful democracy!

    And of course, this feedback (incentive) loop – the more wealth the wealthy get the more effective is their corruption of all things that are supposedly there to function in the interests of the working majority – feeds on itself. This is the history of the last 3 decades. We now see the logical result of the year by year increasing 'amplitude' of this loop.

    Until we decide to limit wealth accumulation of 'public' representatives, nothing will change.

    Don't get me wrong. Enterprise & substantial reward has it's place in society. Some of us can usefully 'play on a bigger stage' to the benefit of all. But they have no business purporting to represent the majority when they so clearly do not & cannot, as is now proven by the evidence before us. Evidenced by both the creation of the mess & their so-called solutions now being inflicted.

    Of course this system is now clashing with the collapsing 'Pyramid' scheme that is infinite growth on a finite planet which virtually entirely disregards 'natural' capital on the one hand & pollution on the other.

    In fairness, it is human society as a whole that must cure it's 'greed' psychosis – most of us know – and studies have proved – that wealth beyond the meeting of our basic needs, for near all of us, brings no increase in wellbeing or happiness.

    Failure to recognise this basic truth and, importantly, put it at the core of our organising of society, is going to bring some very nasty results for most us in the coming decades.

  13. @ Ken, mikehall

    Mikael Greer(The Archdruid Report) was writing recently that the Yanks have been at this ever since the 70's when their economy went into decline in real terms and that their pseudo-growth was based upon manufacturing credit and exporting dollars to compensate for the decline.

    Mike, your comment about labour and wealth put me in mind of a comment(by MattInShanghai) I read recently at CynicusEconomicus blog:
    ===
    (If).. My personal wealth is due to being able to extract economic rent from other members of society.. (then) does not contribute to the overall national wealth of the UK.

    In the 19th century, economists were well aware of the distinction between "value from production" – i.e. "real" wealth and "value from obligation" – various forms of rent seeking activity (debt instruments, bonds, land titles etc.), even though both kinds of value could be exchanged (i.e. had money value).

    For ideological reasons, this distinction was abolished by the neoclassical economists, who:

    1. Extended the concept of wealth to include everything with exchange (i.e. money) value and considered national wealth to be the sum total of the wealth of its citizens.
    2. Lumped rent income with capital income, therefore eliminating the category of "unearned income".

    Thanks to this little change in the "view" of wealth, rentier (unproductive) activities now become part of national "wealth creation" in official GDP figures.
    ===

  14. Ahimsa

    I'm a big fan of Michael Greer, having read two of his books last year.

    In the 1920s nobel Chemist Frederick Soddy got bored of inventing nuclear physics and embarked instead on understanding the world of economics. His books on this have yet to be surpassed:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth,_Virtual_Wealth_and_Debt

    I recall one of his phrases "the robot and the rentier", which perfectly describes the two class system that you and Mike refer to.

    Economics had its chance to become a true science if it followed Soddy. I agree with your point that instead political influence took it down the neoclassical route, and look where it has taken us.

  15. @Golem XIV:

    Yep, thanks to you and Mikehall for reminding me about the non-linearities involved. We can probably all agree that the idea of speculators profiting from the misery caused by the volatility they induce in markets is morally wrong.

    What I am not yet sure of is whether the volatility they induce is entirely undesirable. It may be that it will also stimulate desirable outcomes, such as greater self-reliance in less wealthy countries or the shocks which can lead to the ousting of such undesirables as Mubarak in Egypt. Or, in the case of oil, a taster of what life may look like when the oil runs out while we may still have time to enact a graceful transition.

    @Mikehall: Couldn't have put it better myself. Watching a loved ones greed lead them to sacrifice their free time and health in the pursuit of wealth is a saddening experience. When it becomes the main objective in society it's a catastrophe in the making.

    Here's an anecdote which I think illustrates the madness. A distant relative of mine was lamenting that they could not progress up the property ladder because the value of the home they currently owned had not inflated sufficiently in the five or so years they had lived in it for the profit to pay for the larger deposit on the new home of their dreams. The amazing aspect of this is that they were a childless couple working full time in very well paid professions in a cheap corner of the country. I lose count of the exotic holidays they have been on in that time: Hawaii, South Africa etc. It's mind blowing to me that this is how people think life works. You just spend every last penny on whatever you feel like and the magic of the property bubble will make us all rich, pay off student loans and buy us the home of our dreams.

    I just couldn't think where to start the discussion. The sad thing is that it will really be painful for people who have bought in to this model of life to handle the cognitive dissonance involved if the wheels fall off the current system.

  16. Hi Golem,
    I watched an interesting documentary the other day. I'm sure you'll have seen it. It’s called the War on Democracy and is about how the Americans go about taking the natural resources of Latin American countries.
    The basic principal is this. The CIA helps overthrow the (usually democratically elected) government and replace it with a friendly dictator. The dictator then allows the American companies access to their natural resources at a cheap price. Obviously the dictator and his inner council become pretty wealthy in the process whilst the indigenous peoples tend to get shafted. It showed how this had happened in Chile under Pinochet, and in Guatemala, Panama, Nicaragua, Honduras and El Salvador. It also alluded to potential support for the dictators in Brazil, Argentina and elsewhere.

    It got me thinking about the Middle East. Whatever your views are on religion, it’s fair to say that it’s a pretty effective form of population control (except when 2 factions collide). In my opinion, the champion of this has to be the Saudi's. Here, the friendly Islamic monarchy has been great for the US.

    To get to the point, Saudi is controlled by a Monarch who, just like Latin American dictators gives his countries resources to the US at a reasonable price for in return for their support. This might be in the form of weapons, technology or invasion of Iraq in Gulf War 1.

    If QE (via speculation)is leading to inflation abroad, and the people of these countries are beginning to overthrow their dictators who are loyal to Washington, could America be in a perfect storm of not only losing their supply of overseas raw materials, but haveing debased the Dollar so much that they can no longer afford to bring them in at an affordable price when the markets settle back down again?

    In short, could QE be a sort of suicide for the American empire?

    Keep up the good work!!

    Michael

  17. fitzy / michael

    Thanks for the recommendation of the film. I'm just finishing up "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins which covers exactly this ground.

    He was in on the game of coercing regimes to let the US exploit resources. The US would loan the county the money (maybe via IMF), use this to then pay US contractors to exploit the nation, AND then demanded repayment.

    If the regime didn't play ball then, well either a plane crash or full scale invasion (e.g. Panama) results.

    I've often wondered how Saudi Arabia switched from being a lead OPEC instigator of the price hike in 1973, to complete US capitulation in 74. This books explains it perfectly.

  18. Golem thanks
    very succinct,
    What really bothers me is that I think its quite possible that the bankstards bond holders have run war game scenarios on all this and on every move they own the initiative. No contrary sign so far.

  19. To a certain extent it applies to China too. Their greatest resource – their people – have been exploited to make all the crap we fill our houses with.

    If the US does completely trash the Dollar, what will the Saudi's and the Chinese have to say about being left with a load of worthless paper money.

  20. @StevieFinn:

    thanks also for the link Stevie, great to know where the expression stockholder comes from. Incredible that such a simple system of money could function so well!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *