Europe Crisis Deepens

According to Bloomberg, The Euribor, the European equivalent of the Libor (remember that from 2008?) is locking up as banks decline to lend to each other. Those European banks that do have money are putting it in the ECB overnight in preference to lending it to the European banks that desperately need it – such as Santander in Spain and all the Italian Banks led by UniCredit.

Once the Euroibor starts to freeze that is the signal for non-European banks to stop lending to European banks altogether. Why should they trust European banks if fellow Europeans don’t. Banks have to have overnight funding or they die.

I think we are now closer to the edge of then cliff than we have been at any time since AIG and Lehman’s collapsed.  Without short term and overnight funding Europe’s banks will die within the week, so the ECB will now certainly step up its overnight lending to any and all not as a matter of prudent banking but of political panic. That however will be merely the response to the weekend’s Euribor freeze. I say response because it is not a solution. The banks can’t stay addicted to ECB methadone. The amounts would simply run out of control.

But even before the Euribor crisis happened there was already a larger the problem which had, along with the US downgrade, caused a great part of last weeks massive sell-off and panic in Europe. Namely that the EFSF cannot, unless it is vastly increased – some are saying 2 trillion euros would be the sort of figure –  bail out Italy and Spain.

As I wrote in Fanfare of Failure the EFSF doesn’t have enough money or credibility to be seen as a credible back stop for Italy or Spain. Particularly because when it was set up just last year, as the bail out fund that would save Europe’s banks, Spain and Italy were two of its larger backers. Now they are no longer backers but desperate customers.

Once Spain and Italy ceased to be backers and turned to insolvent customers the EFSF is over as an effective force. The only solvent backers it now has of any size are France and Germany. And lots of people are just waiting for France to suffer a downgrade similar to America’s. Which leaves Germany holding the entire bill.  That won’t fly on the markets and certainly won’t in Germany. So the EFSF is over unless Merkel and Germany can be blackmailed. I don’t think that is going to happen.

What this means is the the ECB will have to start buying massive amounts of Italian and Spanish bonds – the bonds those countries now cannot sell on the open markets. And that is what we rumoured on Friday and led to a modest claw back of 50 points on the Dow. Reports now are that the ECB is going to buy significant amounts. The ECB is talking of ‘dysfunctional markets’ is an all too familiar replay of 08-09.  Nothing has changed. Same debts being hidden, same banks being saved, saved calls for more austerity cuts. From MarketWatch,

Frank Engels, head of asset allocation strategy at Barclays Capital, said in a conference call Sunday that an announcement of further fiscal austerity by Italy and Spain and possibly France is needed to stabilize investor sentiment with regards to Europe.

My question is how will the ECB now step up its buying and keep it rolling forwards so that in effect ceases to be short term loans and liquidity and become a stand in for the failed EFSF for long term transfer of private bank debts to the public (ECB) vault?

You see the ECB is not tied to any particular nation, nor Treasury nor tax base. The ECB works by governments or more recently banks (who do it through their nation’s central bank) depositing ‘assets’ in the ECB against which the ECB issues Euros. The idea is that the ECB issues Euros but always against high quality assets. By regulating how much is on deposit, it controls how much euro cash is out there. And since it was all supposed to be short term (essentially Repo arrangements – Repurchase agreements where assets are ‘bought’ by the bank under agreement to resell at a fixed later date and price) it is not a bail out because the assets are going to be re-purchased by the bank which originally deposited them.

That’s how it was. But it’s easy to see that all you have to do is keep rolling over one repo to a new one and those ‘assets’ can remain in the ECB and the bank or nation that put them there can keep a permanent bail out.

That is what I suspect is now going to vastly expand. The ECB will say any expansion will be only temporary while the markets are ‘dysfunctional’. But that will be a knowing lie because the markets aren’t dysfunctional, they are reacting to the fear that Europe’s banks can no longer rely on nations to hide and pay off their losses for them.

One interesting detail before I go. The UK is not a backer of the EFSF. A fact the UK government has made much of in the sense of saying how Europe must solve its own problems and the UK will not have to pay. BUT, the UK IS a backer of the ECB. Here are the three largest plus GB.

Bank                        % Capital   Paid up Capital

Deutsche Bundesbank 18.9373     1,406,533,694.10
Banque de France       14.2212 1,056,253,899.48    
Banca d’Italia              12.4966 928,162,354.81      


Bank of England          14.5172 58,580,453.65       

The BoE figures look wrong. The BoE ‘owns’, has as large a percentage of investment in the ECB as France. Almost as large as Germany.  But the actual amount seems far too small. That is because Non-EU members, like the Uk don’t have to actually pay up theirn full amount.

BUT… I wonder if as part of an emergency measure the BoE would be asked to step up along side the Bundesbank and the Bank of France (especially if France faces growing rumour of its own downgrade) and pay up its full amount?

If it did – and this is 100% speculation – what assets would it put up?

You see to expand its ‘lending’ to Italy and its banks, the ECB must get large new deposits of assets in to its vaults to back the Euros’s it lends out. But what sort of worthless junk can Italy or Spain offer. Their own debt is in trouble and the debt of their private banks is the problem in the first place. Of course the ECB will accept their junk as it has already been doing for months from Greece and Portugal already. But the more it does the more it endangers its own credibility. At some point the ECB will need some real collateral. If all it can do is turn to Germany and Franc then has the same sort of problem as the EFSF.

I wonder if the BoE would be asked to dip in to the immense pile of hundreds of billions on US debt that the BoE has been buying up over the last two years.

The BoE has had all those hunderds of billions of US debt/bonds on its books as AAA rated assets. Could the ECB use them for a while? You can see where I’m going with this.  Once again, but now on the ultimate scale, we would have one lender of last hope (the ECB) using the IOU’s of another Lender of last hope (the US) to prop up its solvency.

We are once again close to the edge and the crime of it is that the problems we have now are the same as we had three years ago only now made bigger and more painful by having had three years of yet more debt creation and transfer of public money to pay off private debts.

13 thoughts on “Europe Crisis Deepens”

  1. Hello,

    Been following your posts for some weeks now, but this is my first post. You make it sound like they can keep manipulating things in their favour, without consequences, for some time to come. If you had to draw up a timeline for the whole charade to end what would it look like and what milestones should we be mindful of as a sign?

    Regards

  2. forensicstatistician

    This is somewhat scary reading. Put in context of the UK social unrest (these might not be just flash in the pan riots), Middle East squabbles and civilian slaughter, even the Israeli’s mass protesting and we have a heady cocktail of financial, social and economic breakdown.

    Gold has skyrocketed this morning. The attack on Dollar hegemony is escalating – slowly but surely. Anyone interested in the international reserve currency warfare should watch Max Keiser's interview with Ned Naylor Leyland where they discuss the newly launched Pan Asia Gold Exchange (PAGE):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRDAOAow4BI

    If as Ned suggests the new PAGE will enable both better "price discovery" for Gold, as well as non-Chinese the chance to hold / invest Renmimbi too, then this is indeed economic warfare of immense proportions.

    Fractures and fissures are opening up all over the place!

  3. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Forensic,

    Thanks I hadn't seen the news about PAGE. But it fits exactly with what we were discussing here some omnths ago doesn't it. A broadly gold based/traded currency in which China, Russia, India and Iran will have a major interest. And also an expansion of the Yuan?Renmimbi as an international Settlement Currency.

    Certainly there are moves in Swiss Private Banking to move out of the US and into Hong Kong. Quite serious moves I think. Something of a sea change afoot.

    Added together does come, as you say, to a broad econimic shift/war.

  4. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    Mercury4,

    That's a very difficult thing to hazard. I am oiut most of teh day but will think on it and get back to you. If I could time things I'd be the richest man alive. And I'm not.

    But in the mean time welcome.

  5. theprofromdover

    So where is the hero INSIDE * the system who will bang the heads together and force them to face the facts?
    I don't think there is anyone, so how can the boil be lanced?
    * cos we (the rabble) really don't count.

  6. the trouble with economics is that none of them and all of them are right.
    Is theIn quantum mechanics, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle states precise inequalities that constrain certain pairs of physical properties, such as measuring the present position while determining future momentum of a particle. Both cannot be simultaneously done to arbitrarily high precision. In other words, the more precisely one property is measured, the less precisely the other can be controlled, determined, or known. heisenburg uncertainty principle any good for understanding economics?

  7. To those who have only joined recently, can I recommend David's film – High Anxieties – the Mathematics of Chaos. (It's there on You Tube) Extremely prescient, and well worth the effort. All about tipping points. Tell your friends.

  8. Every time I go on here I´m depressed. Give us some hope with some posts about what politicians should be doing.

  9. It looks to me like the play is to transfer as much of the dodgy debt to public obligation, thru' the ECB etc., as possible, before the system crashes. The only available response will then be to print(keyboard) currency, likely $, € & £ all needed, in favour of the casino banksters. They will get their cash and the austerity depressed economies will give them the fire sale opportunity of the millenium & even more power than now. Bye bye welfare & public health care. Work to pay your debt servitude (directly via private 'rent' or indirectly thru' public 'rent' paid on to the banks) or die.

    Create as much austerity chaos & division in the bewildered herd so they don't cop on –

    -that the now invevitable 'keyboard' money to be created could rather be given to citizens as jobs & investment in the real economy directly, nationalising the high street banks as needed (with full reserve banking) & tell the wealthy bankster elites (& their 'useful idiots') to go f&%k themselves once & for all. (Political leaders, economists & media commentators with vertebrae & brain intact required – apply within.)

    Brilliant speech (do read it) by Prof James Galbraith recently covering the ills of the economics 'establishment' & the obscene mindset of the entire bankster & mega-corp system. Transcript here:

    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/james-galbraith-on-fraud-and-how-bad-economic-thinking-got-us-in-this-mess.html

    "…the fraud is systemic & irreversible…" (or words to that effect)

    Galbraith is a supporter of 'Post-Keynesian' 'MMT' economics &, I believe, full reserve banking, removing the 'casino' at source.

  10. Woah, what a day.

    What's your take on the damage done to BoA's stock price (down 20%)? How significant is the AIG lawsuit?

    The thought occurred that if AIG is able to show in law that Countrywide knowingly misrepresented the value of its paper, this might have current implications for the valuation of BoA assets. Anything in this?

  11. Golem XIV - Thoughts

    SD and all,

    Sorry I have been away all day till just now.

    SD,

    The scale of Countrywide's misrepresentation are so collosal that only a congenital idiot or a highly paid lawyer could not see clear intent. The statitical odds against each and every 'error' being an innocent mistake are just too large.

    The problem is they all did it. The evidence has been there for well over a year. I have written about it here and many others have written far more and in far more detail.

    BoA will not make it.
    In Europe UniCredit is dead.
    In the UK RBS is moribund.
    I do not beileve Santander is as healthy as they would have us believe. Same goes for Commerzbank.
    Soc Gen and Credit Agricole are doubtful.
    Deutsche Bank is massively exposed but Berlin will not let them go down.

    As for assets they are all being held at mark to model values and held in mythic 'hold to maturity' so as not to have to have any value other than par. These are all State sanctioned lies which the market is no longer inclined to buy in to any more.

    The bil for 'restoring confidence' is now quite beyond many countries.

  12. What would the BoE put up?

    At some point, with respect to treaty-fixed obligations, the answer is "abrogation", or in less fancy latinates "so long, chaps".

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.